Flexible and scalable participatory syndromic and virological surveillance for respiratory infections: our experiences in The Netherlands
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic participatory digital syndromic surveillance systems proved itself, as it is scalable, flexible and function independent from the health care system or health care seeking behaviour. A limitation of syndromic surveillance is the inability of pathogen identification. We describe our experiences regarding integrating self-swabs with centralized testing into a participatory syndromic surveillance system in the Netherlands ( Infectieradar ).
Methods
In the 2022/2023 winter season Infectieradar was extended to include nose- and throat swabs. Participants received test-kits including SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests for home use as well as nose- and throat swabs. All SARS-CoV-2 positive participants and a random sample of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 self-test negative participants were asked to return a nose- and throat swab by regular post. Self-test negative swabs were tested by multiplex-PCR on 22 pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2. Self-test SARS-CoV-2 positive samples with a Ct-value < 30 were sequenced for variant analysis.
Results
Over 17,000 participants were included in the study. We collected 1,475 (median: 37 per week) swabs from participants with positive and 4,096 swabs (median: 136 per week) from participants with negative SARS-CoV-2 antigen self-tests. Of the swabs following a negative self-test, 47.7% tested positive in the multiplex-PCR, and rhinovirus/enterovirus was the most frequently detected pathogen (24.5%). Self-test SARS-CoV-2 positivity was laboratory-confirmed in 96.1% of swabs and showed parallel variant distributions as the national SARS-CoV-2 variant surveillance.
Conclusion
This large-scale, centralized participatory surveillance system provides a comprehensive approach for performing syndromic and virological surveillance in the general population, including respiratory pathogen detection by self-test or multiplex-PCR. Given the continuous collection of samples among those who don’t seek care, the system provides valuable insights into circulating respiratory pathogens and is part of an answer on how to study the transmission, competition, virulence and evolution of circulating pathogens in interpandemic periods.
