FGF2 binds to the allosteric site (site 2) and activates αvβ3 integrin and FGF1 binds to site 2 but suppresses integrin activation by FGF2: a potential mechanism of anti-inflammatory action of FGF1

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

FGF1 is known as an anti-inflammatory and has suppresses insulin resistance. Its homologue FGF2 is pro-inflammatory. Mechanism of FGF1’s anti-inflammatory action and FGF2’s pro-inflammatory action are unknown. Several inflammatory cytokines (e.g., CX3CL1, CCL5, and CXCL12, and CD40L) bind to the classical ligand (RGD)-binding site (site 1) of integrin αvβ3. In addition, they bind to the allosteric site (site 2) of αvβ3, which is distinct from site 1, and allosterically activate αvβ3. Site 2 is involved in inflammatory signals since inflammatory lipid mediator 5-hydroxycholesterol binds to site 2 and induces integrin activation and inflammatory signals (e.g., TNF and IL-6 secretion). We thus hypothesized that FGF1 and FGF2 bind to site 2 and affect activation status of integrins. Here we describe that FGF2 bound to site 2 and allosterically activated αvβ3 integrin. Point mutations in the site 2-binding interface of FGF2 suppressed this activation, indicating that FGF2 binding to site 2 is required for inducing integrin activation. In contrast, FGF1 bound to site 2 but did not activate αvβ3, and instead suppressed integrin activation induced by FGF2, indicating that FGF1 acts as an antagonist of site 2. These findings suggest that FGF1’s anti-inflammatory action is mediated by blocking site 2. FGF1 has potential as an anti-inflammatory agent, but is not appropriate for long-term use since it is potent mitogen. A non-mitogenic FGF1 mutant (R50E), which is defective in binding to site 1 of αvβ3, suppressed αvβ3 activation by FGF2 as effectively as WT FGF1. We propose that FGF1 R50E has therapeutic potential for inflammatory diseases.

Article activity feed