Prevalence and population attributable fractions of potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia in Canada: a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Identification and assessment of modifiable risk factors for dementia is a public health priority in Canada and worldwide. We investigated the prevalence and population attributable fraction (PAF) of 12 potentially modifiable risk factors for all-cause dementia in middle-aged and older Canadians.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study of data from the Comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a national sample of 30,097 individuals between the ages of 45 and 85 at baseline (2011-2015). Risk factors and associated relative risks were taken from a highly cited systematic review published by an international commission on dementia prevention. We estimated the prevalence of each risk factor using sampling weights to be more generalizable to the Canadian population. Individual PAFs were calculated both crudely and weighted for communality, and combined PAFs were calculated with methods reflecting both multiplicative and additive interaction assumptions. Analyses were additionally performed stratified by household income and were repeated at CSLA’s first three-year follow-up (2015-2018).
Results
The most prevalent risk factors at baseline were physical inactivity (63.8%; 95% CI, 62.8% – 64.9%), hypertension (32.8%; 31.7% – 33.8%), and obesity (30.8%; 29.7% – 31.8%). The highest crude PAFs were for physical inactivity (19.9%), traumatic brain injury (16.7%), and hypertension (16.6%). The highest weighted PAFs were for physical inactivity (11.6%), depression (7.7%), and hypertension (6.0%). We estimated that the 12 risk factors combined accounted for 43.4% (37.3%-49.0%) of dementia cases assuming weighted multiplicative interactions and 60.9% (55.7%-65.5%) assuming additive interactions. There was a clear gradient of increasing prevalence and PAF with decreasing income for 9 of the 12 risk factors.
Interpretation
The findings of this study can inform individual and population-level dementia prevention strategies in Canada, focusing efforts on risk factors with the largest impact on the number of dementia cases. Differences in the impact of individual risk factors between this study and other international and regional studies highlight the importance of tailoring national dementia strategies to the local distribution of risk factors.
