Combination of oncolytic Maraba virus with immune checkpoint blockade overcomes therapy resistance in an immunologically cold model of advanced melanoma with dysfunctional T cell receptor signalling
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Over the past decade, cancer immunotherapies have revolutionised the treatment of melanoma; however, responses vary across patient populations. Recently, baseline tumour size has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). MG1 is a novel oncolytic agent with broad tumour tropism that has recently entered early phase clinical trials. The aim of this study was to characterise T cell responses in human and mouse melanoma models following MG1 treatment and to establish if features of the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) at two distinct tumour burdens would impact the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy.
Methods
Human 3D in vitro priming assays were performed to measure anti-tumour and anti-viral T cell responses following MG1 infection. TCR sequencing, T2 killing assay, and peptide recall assays were used to assess the evolution of the TCR repertoire, and measure specific T cell responses, respectively. In vivo , subcutaneous 4434 melanomas were characterised using RNAseq, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and flow cytometry. The effectiveness of intra-tumoural MG1 was assessed in advancing 4434 tumours and the generation of anti-tumour and anti-viral T cells measured by splenocyte recall assays. Finally, combination MG1 and α-PD-1 therapy was investigated in advanced 4434 tumours.
Results
MG1 effectively primed functional cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) against tumour associated antigens (TAA) as well as virus-derived peptides, as assessed using peptide recall and T2 killing assays, respectively. TCR sequencing revealed that MG1-primed CTL comprised larger clusters of similar CDR3 amino acid sequences compared to controls. In vivo testing of MG1 demonstrated that MG1 monotherapy was highly effective at treating early disease, resulting in 90% cures; however, the efficacy of MG1 reduced as the disease burden (local tumour size) increased, and the addition of α-PD-1 was required to overcome resistance in more advanced disease. Differential gene expression profiles revealed that increased tumour burden was associated with an immunologically colder TIME. Furthermore, analysis of TCR signalling in advancing tumours demonstrated a different dynamic of TCR engagement compared to smaller tumours, in particular a shift in antigen recognition by CD4+ cells, from conventional to regulatory subset.
Conclusion
Combination of MG1 with αPD-1 overcomes therapy resistance in an immunologically ‘cold’ model of advanced melanoma.
