Causal inference with observational data and unobserved confounding variables

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

As ecology tackles progressively larger problems, we have begun to move beyond the scale at which we can conduct experiments to derive causal inferences. Randomized controlled experiments have long been seen as the gold standard for quantifying causal effects in ecological systems. In contrast, observational data, though available at larger scales, has primarily been used to either explore ideas derived from experiments or to generate patterns to inspire experiments – not for causal inference. This avoidance of using observational data for causal inference arises from the valid fear of confounding variables – variables that influence both the causal variable of interest and the studied effect that can lead to spurious correlations. Unmeasured confounders can lead to incorrect conclusions – a problem known as Omitted Variable Bias – that leads to the common saying, “Correlation is not causation.” However, many other scientific disciplines that cannot do experiments for reasons of ethics or feasibility have developed rigorous approaches for causal inference from observational data. Here we show how Ecologists can harness these approaches, starting by using causal diagrams to identify potential known and unknown sources of confounding. We use a motivating example of assessing the effects of warming on intertidal snails to discuss how ecologists currently handle observational survey data and inference – often incorrectly with mixed models that produce biased coefficient estimates. We present alternative sampling designs and the statistical model designs that make use of them, discuss how they work using the language of causal path diagrams, demonstrate how easily they can be applied to common ecological datasets, and finally how well they are able to overcome problems of unmeasured confounding variables. We show how all of these techniques out-perform common approaches via simulation with respect to both bias and power. Our goal is to enable researchers to advance the field of Ecology at scale using observational data both on its own and as an important complement to experiments.

Article activity feed