Genome similarities between human-derived and mink-derived SARS-CoV-2 make mink a potential reservoir of the virus
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 has RNA as the genome, which makes the virus more prone to mutations. Occasionally, mutations help a virus to cross the species barrier. The SARS-CoV-2 infection to humans and minks ( Neovison vison ) are examples of zoonotic spillover. Many studies have been published on the analysis of human-derived SARS-CoV-2, here we performed mutation analysis on the minks-derived SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences. We analyzed all available full-length mink derived SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences on GISAID (214 from Netherlands and 133 from Denmark). We found that the mutation pattern in the Netherlands and Denmark derived samples were different. Out of a total of 201 mutations, we found in this study, only 13 mutations were common in the Netherlands and Denmark derived samples. We found 4 mutations prevailed in the Netherlands and Denmark mink derived samples and these 4 mutations are also reported to prevail in human-derived SARS-CoV-2.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.05.29.493871: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank …
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.05.29.493871: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-