Investigation of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in a Texas summer camp resulting from a single introduction

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. It is estimated that only 10 aerosol-borne virus particles are sufficient to establish a secondary infection with SARS-CoV-2. However, the dispersal pattern of SARS-CoV-2 is highly variable and only 10– 20% of cases are responsible for up 80% of secondary infections. The heterogeneous nature of SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests that super-spreader events play an important role in viral transmission. Super-spreader events occur when a single person is responsible for an unusually high number of secondary infections due to a combination of biological, environmental, and/or behavioral factors. While super-spreader events have been identified as a significant factor driving SARS-CoV-2 transmission, epidemiologic studies have consistently shown that education settings do not play a major role in community transmission. However, an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 was recently reported among 186 children (aged 10-17) and adults (aged 18 +) after attending an overnight summer camp in Texas in June 2021. To understand the transmission dynamics of the outbreak, RNA was isolated from 36 nasopharyngeal swabs collected from patients that attended the camp and 19 control patients with no known connection to the outbreak. Genome sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore platform was performed using the ARTIC approaches for library preparation and bioinformatic analysis. SARS-CoV-2 amplicons were produced from all RNA samples and >70% of the viral genome was successfully reconstructed with >10X coverage for 46 samples. Phylogenetic methods were used to estimate the transmission history and suggested that the outbreak was the result of a single introduction. We also found evidence for secondary transmission from campers to the community. Together, these findings demonstrate that super-spreader events may occur during large gatherings of children.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.05.29.22275277: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.