Anti-chemokine antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection correlate with favorable disease course

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Infection by SARS-CoV-2 leads to diverse symptoms, which can persist for months. While antiviral antibodies are protective, those targeting interferons and other immune factors are associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Instead, we discovered that antibodies against specific chemokines are omnipresent after COVID-19, associated with favorable disease, and predictive of lack of long COVID symptoms at one year post infection. Anti-chemokine antibodies are present also in HIV-1 infection and autoimmune disorders, but they target different chemokines than those in COVID-19. Monoclonal antibodies derived from COVID- 19 convalescents that bind to the chemokine N-loop impair cell migration. Given the role of chemokines in orchestrating immune cell trafficking, naturally arising anti-chemokine antibodies associated with favorable COVID-19 may be beneficial by modulating the inflammatory response and thus bear therapeutic potential.

One-Sentence Summary:

Naturally arising anti-chemokine antibodies associate with favorable COVID-19 and predict lack of long COVID.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.05.23.493121: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: The study was performed in compliance with all relevant ethical regulations and the study protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Canton Ticino (ECCT): CE-3428 and CE-3960.
    Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and all samples were coded to remove identifiers at the time of blood withdrawal.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationAll assays were done in triplicate, and for each well the migrated cells were counted at 100-fold magnification in 5 randomly selected high-power fields (5HPF).
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Chemotaxis was performed with preB 300.19 expressing CCR2, at a final IgG concentration of 200 µg/ml, in the presence of the chemokine concentration resulting in peak migration when no antibodies were added (CCL2 [10nM], CCL7 [100nM], CCL8 [100nM]).
    CCR2
    suggested: None
    CCL2
    suggested: None
    CCL7
    suggested: None
    CCL8
    suggested: None
    Plates were subsequently washed 4 times with washing buffer and incubated with anti-human IgG secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (GE Healthcare, NA933) at a 1:5000 dilution in PBS + 0.05% Tween-20.
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: (GE Healthcare Cat# NA933-1ml, RRID:AB_772208)
    Kinetic of signature anti-chemokine IgG antibodies (fig.
    anti-chemokine IgG
    suggested: None
    Single cell sorting by flow cytometry: B cells were enriched from PBMCs of uninfected controls or of COVID-19 convalescent individuals 6 months after COVID-19 (participant CLM9 for anti-CCL8 antibodies; CLM64 for anti-CCL20 antibodies; CLM5, CLM7 and CLM33 for anti-CXCL13 antibodies; and CLM8 and CLM30 for anti-CXCL16 antibodies), using the pan-B-cell isolation kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-101-638).
    anti-CCL20
    suggested: None
    anti-CXCL13
    suggested: None
    anti-CXCL16
    suggested: None
    The enriched B cells were subsequently stained in FACS buffer (PBS + 2% FCS + 1mM EDTA) with the following antibodies/reagents (all 1:200 diluted) for 30 min on ice: anti-CD20-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences, 335828), anti-CD14-APC-eFluor 780 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, 47-0149-42), anti-CD16-APC-eFluor 780 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, 47-0168-41), anti-CD3-APC-eFluor 780 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, 47-0037-41), anti-CD8-APC-eFluor 780 (Invitrogen, 47-0086-42)
    anti-CD20-PE-Cy7
    suggested: None
    anti-CD14-APC-eFluor 780
    suggested: None
    anti-CD16-APC-eFluor 780
    suggested: None
    anti-CD3-APC-eFluor 780
    suggested: None
    anti-CD8-APC-eFluor 780
    suggested: None
    Amplicons from this first PCR reaction served as templates for sequence and ligation independent cloning (SLIC) into human IgG1 antibody expression vectors.
    human IgG1
    suggested: None
    Where indicated, the anti-Zika virus monoclonal antibody Z021 (75) was used as an isotype control.
    anti-Zika
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped reporter virus and neutralization assay: To generate (HIV-1/NanoLuc2AEGFP)-SARS-CoV-2 particles, HEK293T cells were co- transfected with the three plasmids pHIVNLGagPol, pCCNanoLuc2AEGFP, and SARS- CoV- 2 S as described elsewhere (47, 80)
    HEK293T
    suggested: None
    Briefly, threefold serially diluted plasma samples (from 1:50 to 1:328’050) were incubated with SARS-CoV- 2 pseudotyped virus for 1h at 37 °C, and the virus-plasma mixture was subsequently incubated with 293TACE2 cells for 48 h.
    293TACE2
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped reporter virus and neutralization assay: To generate (HIV-1/NanoLuc2AEGFP)-SARS-CoV-2 particles, HEK293T cells were co- transfected with the three plasmids pHIVNLGagPol, pCCNanoLuc2AEGFP, and SARS- CoV- 2 S as described elsewhere (47, 80)
    pHIVNLGagPol
    suggested: None
    pCCNanoLuc2AEGFP
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    S5E): Experiments were performed with plasma samples assayed at a 1:50 dilution side-by-side on the same plate, and the average optical density at 450 nm obtained from two independent experiments was plotted with GraphPad Prism.
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Live single Zombie-NIR−CD14−CD16−CD3−CD8−CD20+Ova−N-loop-PE+N-loop- AF647+ B cells were single-cell sorted into 96-well plates containing 4 μl of lysis buffer (0.5× PBS, 10 mM DTT, 3,000 units/ml RNasin Ribonuclease Inhibitors [Promega, N2615]) per well using a FACS Aria III, and the analysis was performed with FlowJo software.
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    1 was generated from the structure of inactive CCR2 (PDB code: 5T1A) (81), together with the electron microscopy structures of CCR5 and CCR6 (PDB codes: 6MEO and 6WWZ, respectively (82, 83) by using SWISS-MODEL (84) server and the molecular graphics program PyMOL 2.5.0 for modeling the N- and C-terminus of the receptor.
    PyMOL
    suggested: (PyMOL, RRID:SCR_000305)
    t-SNE: t-SNE analysis was performed using the Rtsne R package v 0.15 (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rtsne) using the AUC values for all chemokines.
    Rtsne
    suggested: (Rtsne, RRID:SCR_016342)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.