Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Introduction

The capacity to deliver essential health services has been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic particularly due to lockdown restrictions. Telemedicine provides a safe, efficient, and effective solution that addresses the needs of patients and the health system. However, there remain implementation challenges and barriers to patient adoption in resource-limited settings as in the Philippines. This study thus aimed to describe patient perspectives and experiences with telemedicine services, and explore the factors that influence telemedicine use and satisfaction.

Methods

This study used a mixed-methods design through online surveys and in-depth interviews. An online survey using Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician & Group Adult Visit Survey 4.0 (beta) and Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) was accomplished by 200 participants aged 18 to 65 years. A subsample of 16 participants was interviewed to provide insights to the quantitative data. We used descriptive statistics to analyze survey data and grounded theory to analyze data from interviews.

Results

Participants were generally satisfied with telemedicine services, with most reporting that this was an efficient and convenient alternative to face-to-face consultations. However, only 2 in 5 perceived telemedicine as affordable. Our quantitative findings suggest that participants preferred telemedicine services rather than in-person consultations, especially in cases where they feel that their condition is not urgent and does not need extensive physical examination. Safety against COVID-19, and the availability of multiple communication platforms contributed to patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Negative perceptions of patients on their telemedicine provider, perceived higher costs, poor connectivity and other technological issues were found to be barriers to patient satisfaction.

Discussion

Telemedicine is viewed as a safe and efficient alternative to receiving care. Continued adoption of telemedicine will require improvements in technology and better patient communication related to their telemedicine provider and the associated costs.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.05.21.22274939: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsField Sample Permit: Sampling and Study Size: Convenience sampling was used given the logistical constraints to conduct field data collection during the pandemic.
    IRB: Ethics Statement: This research was given ethical approval by the Ateneo University Research Ethics Committee
    Consent: Digital written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to the interview.
    Sex as a biological variableWe described participants according to their age in years, sex (male or female), setting of residence (urban or rural), residence by island group (Luzon, Visayas, Mindanao), educational attainment (secondary or lower, college, post-graduate), employment status (full-time employment, part-time employment, unemployed, student, retired), monthly household income, monthly household health expenditure, and monthly individual health expenditure, membership to any health insurance (yes, no), overall health rating measured as a 5-point Likert scale.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Data Analysis: Quantitative Analysis: We analyzed our quantitative data using descriptive statistics: percentage for categorical variables, and median for continuous variables using SPSS Statistics version 25.0 (20).
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    However, the inherent limitations of telemedicine restrict its utility, especially for health conditions that require physical assessments and laboratory tests. We found that telemedicine use and satisfaction are influenced by a number of factors including: safety during the pandemic, privacy, affordability, convenience and accessibility, and availability of more avenues of communication. Safety was a major concern that prompted participants to use telemedicine. Telemedicine enables patients to avoid situations that would expose them to SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, such as traveling and staying for long periods in high-risk environments. These safety concerns, together with lockdown restrictions, resulted to significant declines in hospital admissions for non-urgent procedures (2). Innovative solutions through telemedicine have been introduced including video visits (25). Participants also mentioned that telemedicine assisted in maintaining privacy. The benefits of anonymity are especially important with regards to sensitive and potentially stigmatizing health issues such as mental or sexual health conditions (29). Because telemedicine removes the need to travel, participants also viewed it as more affordable and convenient. This was noted by participants as an enabling factor to use telemedicine, especially since a third of our participants are full-time employees, while a quarter are students. Traveling for healthcare purposes could mean missing work or scho...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.