Infection prevention and control preparedness among public hospitals and COVID-19 temporary treatment and monitoring facilities in the Philippines

  1. Vergil de Claro
  2. Noemi Bautista
  3. Ma. Rosario Torralba
  4. Vina Vanessa Castro
  5. Miguel Angelo Lucero
  6. Lady Jedfeliz Molleno
  7. Laurentiu Stan

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives

An effective response to COVID-19 necessitates rigid compliance of health facilities to infection prevention and control (IPC) protocols to protect HCWs, prevent onward transmission, and mitigate the impact of the outbreak on the health care system. The study aims to assess the compliance of public hospitals and temporary treatment and monitoring facilities (TTMFs) to IPC standards for COVID-19.

Methods

A baseline assessment survey was conducted between July 20 to August 18, 2020, from selected facilities in 38 local government units (LGU) across the country utilising a 35-point questionnaire corresponding to a set of standards issued by the Philippine Department of Health.

Results

The study shows that public hospitals reported sufficient IPC preparedness and compliance compared to TTMFs in the domains of engineering and administrative controls. Both types of facilities reported weak compliance in the use of color-coded bags and in having a central storage for infectious waste. In addition, among TTMFs adherence to proper labelling of waste bins, presence of instructional materials for waste disposal, directional signages for movements of HCWs and patients, availability of an IPC policy, and advocacy materials on proper handwashing, respiratory etiquette, and physical distancing, and PPE use were also low.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the importance of IPC preparedness among health care facilities to effectively prevent disease transmission and mitigate its impact on the health care system. The findings suggests that periodic monitoring and augmentation of resources are needed to immediately address the compliance gaps. However, systemic improvements and long-term investments are required to sustain IPC practices over time.

What is already known?

Infection prevention and control measures are effective at protecting patients and health care workers from facility-acquired infections and averting onward transmission of the disease.

What are the new findings?

Findings from this study highlight the critical gaps in infection prevention and control preparedness among established healthcare settings like hospitals and in repurposed spaces such as temporary facilities for COVID-19 isolation that were primarily set up to manage the surge in cases.

What do the new findings imply?

It focuses attention on the periodic monitoring of health facilities’ compliance to standard infection prevention and control practices especially during outbreak situations as a basis for identifying immediate resource and technical requirements, and for planning the needed investments in the long term.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.05.11.22274966: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2022.05.11.22274966v1 on medRxiv