COVID-19 relevant genetic variants confirmed in an admixed population

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

The dissection of factors that contribute to COVID-19 infection and severity has overwhelmed the scientific community for almost 2 years. Current reports highlight the role of in disease incidence, progression, and severity. Here, we aimed to confirm the presence of previously reported genetic variants in an admixed population. Allele frequencies were assessed and compared between the general population (N=3079) for which at least 30% have not been infected with SARS-CoV2 as per July 2021 versus COVID-19 patients (N=106).

Genotyping data from the Illumina GSA array was used to impute genetic variation for 14 COVID-relevant genes, using the 1000G phase 3 as reference based on the human genome assembly hg19, following current standard protocols and recommendations for genetic imputation. Bioinformatic and statistical analyses were performed using MACH v1.0 , R, and PLINK.

A total of 7953 variants were imputed on, ABO, CCR2, CCR9, CXCR6, DPP9, FYCO1, IL10RB/IFNAR2, LZTFL1, OAS1, OAS2, OAS3, SLC6A20, TYK2 , and XCR1 . Statistically significant allele differences were reported for 10 and 7 previously identified and confirmed variants, ABO rs657152, DPP9 rs2109069, LZTFL1 rs11385942, OAS1 rs10774671, OAS1 rs2660, OAS2 rs1293767, and OAS3 rs1859330 p<0.03. In addition, we identified 842 variants in these COVID-related genes with significant allele frequency differences between COVID patients and the general population (p-value <E-2 – E-179).

Our observations confirm the presence of genetic differences in COVID-19 patients in an admixed population and prompts for the investigation of the statistical relevance of additional variants on these and other genes that could identify local and geographical patterns of COVID-19.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.15.22273925: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: All 3185 participants signed an informed consent, followed the principles of the declaration of Helsinki.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    We imputed all variants on these loci/genes according to standard protocols and recommendations for genetic imputation (Marino et al., 2021; Uffelmann et al., 2021) using public data from the 1000G phase 3 as reference based on the human genome assembly hg19 and utilizing current imputation practices with the software MACH v.
    MACH
    suggested: (MACH, RRID:SCR_009621)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.