SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, but not Omicron, induces thymic atrophy and impaired T cell development

  1. Zaigham Abbas Rizvi
  2. Srikanth Sadhu
  3. Jyotsna Dandotiya
  4. Akshay Binyka
  5. Puja Sharma
  6. Virendra Singh
  7. Vinayaka Das
  8. Ritika Khatri
  9. Rajesh Kumar
  10. Sweety Samal
  11. Manjula Kalia
  12. Amit Awasthi

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Pathogenic infections cause thymic atrophy, perturb thymic-T cell development and alter immunological response. Previous studies reported dysregulated T cell function and lymphopenia in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients. However, immune-pathological changes, in the thymus, post severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have not been elucidated. Here, we report SARS-CoV-2 infects thymocytes, depletes CD4+CD8+ (double positive; DP) T cell population associated with an increased apoptosis of thymocytes, which leads to severe thymic atrophy in K18-hACE2-Tg mice. CD44+CD25-T cells were found to be enriched in infected thymus, indicating an early arrest in the T cell developmental pathway. Further, Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) was crucial for thymic atrophy, as anti-IFN-γ antibody neutralization rescued the loss of thymic involution. Therapeutic use of remdesivir (prototype anti-viral drug) was also able to rescue thymic atrophy. While Omicron variant of SARS-CoV2 caused marginal thymic atrophy, delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 exhibited most profound thymic atrophy characterized by severely depleted DP T cells. Recently characterized broadly SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibody P4A2 was able to rescue thymic atrophy and restore thymic developmental pathway of T cells. Together, we provide the first report of SARS-CoV-2 associated thymic atrophy resulting from impaired T cell developmental pathway and also explains dysregulated T cell function in COVID-19.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.07.487556: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2022.04.07.487556v1 on bioRxiv