Tocilizumab, netakimab, and baricitinib in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: An observational study

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in adult patients admitted to hospital with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and treated with a combination of standard-of-care (SOC) and targeted immunosuppressive therapy including anti-IL-17A (netakimab), anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab), or JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor (baricitinib) or with a standard-of-care therapy alone.

Methods

The observational cohort study included 154 adults hospitalized between February and August, 2020 with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 with National Early Warning Score2 (NEWS2) < 7 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels ≤ 140 mg/L on the day of the start of the therapy or observation. Patients were divided into the following groups: I) 4 mg baricitinib, 1 or 2 times a day for an average of 5 days (n = 38); II) 120 mg netakimab, one dose (n = 48); III) 400 mg tocilizumab, one dose (n = 34), IV) SOC only: hydroxychloroquine, antiviral, antibacterial, anticoagulant, and dexamethasone (n = 34).

Results

CRP levels significantly decreased after 72 h in the tocilizumab (p = 1 x 10 -5 ) and netakimab (p = 8 x 10 -4 ) groups and remained low after 120 h. The effect was stronger with tocilizumab compared to other groups (p = 0.028). A significant decrease in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels was observed 72 h after netakimab therapy (p = 0.029). NEWS2 scores significantly improved 72 h after tocilizumab (p = 6.8 x 10 -5 ) and netakimab (p = 0.01) therapy, and 120 h after the start of tocilizumab (p = 8.6 x 10 -5 ), netakimab (p = 0.001), or baricitinib (p = 4.6 x 10 -4 ) therapy, but not in the SOC group. Blood neutrophil counts (p = 6.4 x 10 -4 ) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (p = 0.006) significantly increased 72 h after netakimab therapy and remained high after 120 h. The percentage of patients discharged 5-7 days after the start of therapy was higher in the tocilizumab (44.1%) and netakimab (41.7%) groups than in the baricitinib (31.6%) and SOC (23.5%) groups. Compared to SOC (3 of the 34; 8.8%), mortality was lower in netakimab (0 of the 48; 0%, RR = 0.1 (95% CI: 0.0054 to 1.91)), tocilizumab (0 of the 34; 0%, RR = 0.14 (95% CI: 0.0077 to 2.67)), and baricitinib (1 of the 38; 2.6%, RR = 0.3 (95% CI: 0.033 to 2.73)) groups.

Conclusion

In hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, the combination of SOC with anti-IL-17A or anti-IL-6R therapy were superior or comparable to the combination with JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, and all three were superior to SOC alone. Whereas previous studies did not demonstrate significant benefit of anti-IL-17A therapy for severe COVID-19, our data suggest that such therapy could be a rational choice for mild-to-moderate disease, considering the generally high safety profile of IL-17A blockers. The significant increase in blood neutrophil count in the netakimab group may reflect efflux of neutrophils from inflamed tissues. We therefore hypothesize that neutrophil count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio could serve as markers of therapeutic efficiency for IL-17A-blocking antibodies in the context of active inflammation.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.31.22269942: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: All patients who received tocilizumab, netakimab, or baricitinib provided written informed consent.
    IRB: The study was approved by the local ethical committee of the City Clinical Hospital No.52. Procedures: All patients received SOC treatment at the time of hospital admission according to the corresponding COVID-19 Russian guidelines 2020 (Interim guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19).
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT03447704Active, not recruitingInternational Multicenter Comparative Randomized Placebo-con…
    NCT03598751Active, not recruitingClinical Study of Efficacy and Safety of BCD-085 (Monoclonal…
    NCT04356937CompletedEfficacy of Tocilizumab on Patients With COVID-19
    NCT04320615CompletedA Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab i…
    NCT04381936RecruitingRandomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy
    NCT04421027CompletedA Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Participants With COVI…
    NCT03390101Active, not recruitingAn International Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Plac…
    NCT05302947CompletedCOVID-19 Study at the Russian Clinical and Research Center o…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.