An anchored experimental design and meta-analysis approach to address batch effects in large-scale metabolomics

Large-scale untargeted metabolomics studies suffer from individual variation, batch effects and instrument variability, making comparisons of common spectral features across studies difficult. One solution is to compare studies after compound identification. However, compound identification is expensive and time consuming. We successfully identify common spectral features across multiple studies, with a generalizable experimental design approach. First, we included an anchor strain, PD1074, during sample and data collection. Second, we collected data in blocks with multiple controls. These anchors enabled us to successfully integrate three studies of Caenorhabditis elegans for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) data from five different assays. We found 34% and 14% of features to be significant in LC-MS and NMR, respectively. Between 20-50% of spectral features differ in a mutant and among a set of genetically diverse natural strains, suggesting this reduced set of spectral features are excellent targets for compound identification.