Jupytope: computational extraction of structural properties of viral epitopes

  1. Shamima Rashid
  2. Teng Ann Ng
  3. Chee Keong Kwoh

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Epitope residues located on viral surface proteins are of immense interest in immunology and related applications such as vaccine development, disease diagnosis and drug design. Most tools rely on sequence-based statistical comparisons, such as information entropy of residue positions in aligned columns to infer location and properties of epitope sites. To facilitate cross-structural comparisons of epitopes on viral surface proteins, a python-based extraction tool implemented with Jupyter notebook is presented (Jupytope). Given a viral antigen structure of interest, a list of known epitope sites and a reference structure, the corresponding epitope structural properties can quickly be obtained. The tool integrates biopython modules for commonly used software such as NACCESS, DSSP as well as residue depth and outputs a list of structure-derived properties such as dihedral angles, solvent accessibility, residue depth and secondary structure that can be saved in several convenient data formats. To ensure correct spatial alignment, Jupytope takes a list of given epitope sites and their corresponding reference structure and aligns them before extracting the desired properties. Examples are demonstrated for epitopes of Influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) viral strains. The extracted properties assist detection of two Influenza subtypes and show potential in distinguishing between four major clades of SARS-CoV2, as compared with randomized labels. The tool will facilitate analytical and predictive works on viral epitopes through the extracted structural information. Jupytope and extracted datasets are available at https://github.com/shamimarashid/Jupytope.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1093/bib/bbac362
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.22.484725: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The genomic nucleotide sequences were individually queried against GISAID’s Audacity web application and the top matching clade, lineage and corresponding distances were recorded.
    Audacity
    suggested: None
    The program relies on the Biopython packages (Bio.PDB, Bio.AlignIO) and other structure processing and parser libraries for individual programs listed as follows: NACCESS, DSSP, ResidueDepth (MSMS) and Half Sphere Solvent Exposure (HSExposure).
    Biopython
    suggested: (Biopython, RRID:SCR_007173)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2022.03.22.484725v1 on bioRxiv