Clinical validation and the evaluation of a colorimetric SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP assay identify its robustness against RT-PCR
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The novel coronavirus has infected millions of people all around the world and has posed a great risk to global health. Rapid and accurate tests are needed to take early precautions and control the disease. The most routinely used method is real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) which stands as the gold standard in the detection of SARS-COV-2 viral RNA. However, robust assays as accurate as RT-PCR have been developed for rapid diagnosis and efficient control of the spread of the disease. Reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is one of the time-saving, accurate and cost-effective alternative methods to RT-PCR. In this study, we study the improved RT-LAMP colorimetric assay (N-Fact) to detect SARS-COV-2 viral RNA within 30 minutes using a primer sets special to N gene. Moreover, RT-LAMP colorimetric assay is subjected to authorized clinical studies to test its ability to detect COVID-19 in its early phases. The results reveal RT-LAMP colorimetric assay is an efficient, robust, and rapid assay to be used as in vitro diagnostic tool display competitiveness compared to RT-PCR.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.21.22271747: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: The volunteers of 300 applying for the test at Hacettepe University Hospital with their consent occurring from November 3 through November 24, 2020 were included in the study. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Recombinant DNA Sentences Resources For positive control, N-gene sequence was obtained from National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with GenBank accession number MN908947.3 and genomic positions between 27894..28259 of Wuhan-Hu-1 genome (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_045512) was used which was cloned in pGEM®-T Easy vector. pGEM®-T Easysuggested: RRID:Addgene_66562)Results …
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.21.22271747: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: The volunteers of 300 applying for the test at Hacettepe University Hospital with their consent occurring from November 3 through November 24, 2020 were included in the study. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Recombinant DNA Sentences Resources For positive control, N-gene sequence was obtained from National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with GenBank accession number MN908947.3 and genomic positions between 27894..28259 of Wuhan-Hu-1 genome (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_045512) was used which was cloned in pGEM®-T Easy vector. pGEM®-T Easysuggested: RRID:Addgene_66562)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
