Characterization of Hydrophobic Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV Spike Protein Fusion Peptides Using Single Molecule Force Measurements

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

We address the challenge of understanding how hydrophobic interactions are encoded by fusion peptide sequences within coronavirus (CoV) spike proteins. Within the fusion peptides of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, a largely conserved peptide sequence called FP1 (SFIEDLLFNK and SAIEDLLFDK in SARS-2 and MERS, respectively) has been proposed to play a key role in encoding hydrophobic interactions that drive viral-host cell membrane fusion. While a non-polar triad (LLF) is common to both FP1 sequences, and thought to dominate the encoding of hydrophobic interactions, FP1 from SARS and MERS differ in two residues (Phe 2 versus Ala 2 and Asn 9 versus Asp 9, respectively). Here we explore if single molecule force measurements can quantify hydrophobic interactions encoded by FP1 sequences, and then ask if sequence variations between FP1 from SARS and MERS lead to significant differences in hydrophobic interactions. We find that both SARS-2 and MERS wild-type FP1 generate measurable hydrophobic interactions at the single molecule level, but that SARS-2 FP1 encodes a substantially stronger hydrophobic interaction than its MERS counterpart (1.91 ± 0.03 nN versus 0.68 ± 0.03 nN, respectively). By performing force measurements with FP1 sequences with single amino acid substitutions, we determine that a single residue mutation (Phe 2 versus Ala 2) causes the almost threefold difference in the hydrophobic interaction strength generated by the FP1 of SARS-2 versus MERS, despite the presence of LLF in both sequences. Infrared spectroscopy and circular dichroism measurements support the proposal that the outsized influence of Phe 2 versus Ala 2 on the hydrophobic interaction arises from variation in the secondary structure adopted by FP1. Overall, these insights reveal how single residue diversity in viral fusion peptides, including FP1 of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, can lead to substantial changes in intermolecular interactions proposed to play a key role in viral fusion, and hint at strategies for regulating hydrophobic interactions of peptides in a range of contexts.

SIGNIFICANCE

Fusion of coronaviruses (CoVs) and host cells is mediated by the insertion of the fusion peptide (FP) of the viral spike protein into the host cell membrane. Hydrophobic interactions between FPs with their host cell membranes regulate the viral membrane fusion process and are key to determining infection ability. However, it is not fully understood how the amino acid sequences in FPs mediate hydrophobic interactions. We use single-molecule force measurements to characterize hydrophobic interactions of FPs from SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV. Our findings provide insight into the mechanisms by which the amino acid composition of FPs encodes hydrophobic interactions and their implications for fusion activity critical to the spread of infection.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.05.483104: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.