SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Infection of Individuals with High Titer Neutralizing Antibodies Post-3 rd mRNA Vaccine Dose
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Background
Vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines prevent hospitalization and severe disease caused by wildtype SARS-CoV-2 and several variants, and likely prevented infection when serum neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers were >1:160. Preventing infection limits viral replication resulting in mutation, which can lead to the emergence of additional variants.
Methods
During a longitudinal study to evaluate durability of a three-dose mRNA vaccine regimen (2 primary doses and a booster) using a rapid test that semi-quantitatively measures NAbs, the Omicron variant emerged and quickly spread globally. We evaluated NAb levels measured prior to symptomatic breakthrough infection, in groups infected prior to and after the emergence of Omicron.
Results
During the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant wave, 93% of breakthrough infections in our study occurred when serum NAb titers were <1:80. In contrast, after the emergence of Omicron, study participants with high NAb titers that had received booster vaccine doses became symptomatically infected. NAb titers prior to infection were ≥1:640 in 64% of the Omicron-infected population, ≥1:320 (14%), and ≥1:160 (21%).
Discussion
These results indicate that high titers of NAbs elicited by currently available mRNA vaccines do not protect against infection with the Omicron variant, and that mild to moderate symptomatic infections did occur in a vaccinated and boosted population, although did not require hospitalization.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.03.22270812: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter:…
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.03.22270812: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
