Genetic Examination of Hematological Parameters in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Background

People hospitalized with COVID-19 often exhibit hematological alterations, such as lower lymphocyte and platelet counts, which have been reported to associate with disease prognosis. It is unclear whether inter-individual variability in baseline hematological parameters prior to acute infection influences risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and progression to severe COVID-19.

Methods

We assessed the association of blood cell counts and indices with incident SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 in UK Biobank and the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Synthetic Derivative (VUMC SD). Since genetically determined blood cell measures better represent cell abundance across the lifecourse, we used summary statistics from genome-wide association studies to assess the shared genetic architecture of baseline blood cell counts and indices on COVID-19 outcomes.

Results

We observed inconsistent associations between measured blood cell indices and both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalization in UK Biobank and VUMC SD. In Mendelian randomization analyses using genetic summary statistics, no putative causal relationships were identified between COVID-19 related outcomes and hematological indices after adjusting for multiple testing. We observed overlapping genetic association signals between hematological parameters and COVID-19 traits. For example, we observed overlap between infection susceptibility-associated variants at PPP1R15A and red blood cell parameters, and between disease severity-associated variants at TYK2 and lymphocyte and platelet phenotypes.

Conclusions

We did not find convincing evidence of a relationship between baseline hematological parameters and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 severity, though this relationship should be re-examined as larger and better-powered genetic analyses of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 become available.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.28.22271562: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The QualityLab pipeline was used to extract and clean laboratory values for over 275 million observations across 1.5 million patients as previously described [63].
    QualityLab
    suggested: None
    Analysis of Coincident Genetic Association Signals: We assessed evidence for coincident genetic association signals at COVID-19 loci which had been reported as associated with blood cell traits in a previous GWAS [23, 29].
    Coincident Genetic Association Signals
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    [56] We would highlight several key limitations in this work. First, the time between SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 hospitalizations and blood cell measurements were variable among individuals and different in UKB. We have attempted to account for this, but also emphasize that external factors (diseases, diet changes, etc) may alter hematopoiesis and measured blood cell counts, in contrast to genetic factors associated with these traits, where alleles are assigned at birth. Second, the measures we examined here are those from readily obtained peripheral blood cell counts, but there are other interesting hematological measures which are less frequently assessed in large populations. For example, specific lymphocyte subsets (such as naïve or memory cells) may be relevant to COVID-19 but could not be assessed here. Third, the power of MR analysis is still limited for COVID-19 genetics, even with the coordinating efforts of the HGI meta-analysis. We conducted a MR power analysis at (α = 0.05/87) using the case and control counts from the HGI meta-analysis and the minimum and maximum estimated heritability from the LD Score Regression analysis for our blood cell traits (h2 range: 0.04 -0.3, Supplementary Figure 1). The limited heritability explained by the variants identified in the HGI meta-analyses causes challenges in using both genetic correlation and MR analysis methods. There is a more up to date version of the HGI meta-analysis which includes more samples (Release 6 [57]), ...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.