Non-productive exposure of PBMCs to SARS-CoV-2 induces cell-intrinsic innate immunity responses

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Cell-intrinsic responses mounted in vivo in PBMCs during mild and severe COVID-19 differ quantitatively and qualitatively. Whether they are triggered by signals emitted by productively infected cells of the respiratory tract or are, at least partially, resulting from physical interaction with virus particles, remains unclear. Here, we analyzed susceptibility and expression profiles of PBMCs from healthy donors upon ex vivo exposure to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. In line with the absence of detectable ACE2 receptor expression, human PBMCs were refractory to productive infection. Bulk and single cell RNA-sequencing revealed JAK/STAT-dependent induction of interferon-stimulated genes, but not pro-inflammatory cytokines. This SARS-CoV-2-specific response was most pronounced in monocytes. SARS-CoV-2-RNA-positive monocytes displayed a lower ISG signature as compared to bystander cells of the identical culture. This suggests a preferential invasion of cells with a low ISG base-line profile or delivery of a SARS-CoV-2-specific sensing antagonist upon efficient particle internalization. Together, non-productive physical interaction of PBMCs with SARS-CoV-2-but not SARS-CoV particles stimulates JAK/STAT-dependent, monocyte-accentuated innate immune responses that resemble those detected in vivo in patients with mild COVID-19.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.15.480527: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Withdrawal of blood samples from healthy humans and cell isolation were conducted with approval of the local ethics committee (Ethical review committee of Charité Berlin, votes EA4/166/19 and EA4/167/19).
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line AuthenticationContamination: Cell lines were routinely monitored for absence of mycoplasma and paramyxovirus simian virus 5.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Human ACE2 was detected using a polyclonal goat anti-human ACE2 antibody (1:500, R&D Systems), a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled donkey anti-goat antibody (1:5000, Dinova) and Super Signal West Femto Chemiluminescence Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
    anti-goat
    suggested: None
    As a loading control, samples were analyzed for ꞵ-Actin expression using a mouse anti-ꞵ-actin antibody (1:5000, Sigma Aldrich) and a HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody (1:10000, Dianova).
    anti-ꞵ-actin
    suggested: None
    anti-mouse
    suggested: None
    Samples were multiplexed using TotalSeq-A Antibodies purchased from BioLegend (A0256, A0258 and A0259)
    TotalSeq-A
    suggested: None
    A0256
    suggested: (ABclonal Cat# A0256, RRID:AB_2757069)
    A0259
    suggested: (ABclonal Cat# A0259, RRID:AB_2757072)
    Flow Cytometry Analysis: PBS-washed cells were PFA-fixed and immunostained for individual surface protein expression using the following antibodies: Anti-CD3-FITC (#561807; BD Biosciences), anti-CD4-APC (#555349; BD Biosciences), anti-CD14-PE (#561707; BD Biosciences), anti-CD19-FITC (#21270193; ImmunoTools), anti-NRP1/CD304-APC-R700 (#566038, BD Biosciences), anti-PD-1/CD279-PE (#21272794; ImmunoTools) and anti-TIM-3/CD366-FITC (#345022; Biolegend).
    Anti-CD3-FITC
    suggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# F0522, RRID:AB_476959)
    anti-CD4-APC
    suggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# SAB4700557, RRID:AB_10896237)
    anti-CD14-PE
    suggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# SAB4700101, RRID:AB_10897597)
    anti-CD19-FITC
    suggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# SAB4700112, RRID:AB_10896899)
    anti-NRP1/CD304-APC-R700
    suggested: None
    anti-PD-1/CD279-PE
    suggested: None
    anti-TIM-3/CD366-FITC
    suggested: None
    To determine ACE2 cell surface expression, cells were immunostained with a goat anti-human ACE2 antibody (#AF933, R&D Systems) followed by immunostaining with a secondary antibody donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 488 (#A-11055, Thermo Fisher).
    anti-human ACE2
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Cell Lines and Primary Cells: Vero E6 (ATCC CRL-1586) cells, Calu-3 (ATCC HTB-55) cells and HEK293T (ATCC CRL-3216) cells were cultivated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 1% non-essential amino acids (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C.
    Calu-3
    suggested: ATCC Cat# HTB-55, RRID:CVCL_0609)
    Virus was grown on Vero E6 cells and concentrated using Vivaspin® 20 concentrators with a size exclusion of 100 kDa (Sartorius Stedim Biotech) in order to remove cytokines of lower molecular weight, including IFNs.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Cells inoculated with culture supernatants from uninfected Vero cells mixed with OptiPro serum-free medium supplemented with 0.5% gelatine and PBS, served as mock-infected controls.
    Vero
    suggested: CLS Cat# 605372/p622_VERO, RRID:CVCL_0059)
    ACE2-positive HEK293T cells were generated by transduction of cells with retroviral vectors generated by transfection of HEK293T cells with MLV gag-pol (Bartosch, Dubuisson, and Cosset 2003), pCX4bsrACE2 (Kamitani et al. 2006) and pVSV-G (Stewart et al. 2003).
    HEK293T
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    ACE2-positive HEK293T cells were generated by transduction of cells with retroviral vectors generated by transfection of HEK293T cells with MLV gag-pol (Bartosch, Dubuisson, and Cosset 2003), pCX4bsrACE2 (Kamitani et al. 2006) and pVSV-G (Stewart et al. 2003).
    pCX4bsrACE2
    suggested: None
    pVSV-G
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_138479)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Data analysis was performed using LightCycler Software 4.1 (Roche).
    LightCycler
    suggested: (LightCycler Software, RRID:SCR_012155)
    Protein concentration was determined with the Thermo Scientific’s Pierce™
    Thermo Scientific’s
    suggested: None
    Quality control of the libraries were performed with the KAPA Library Quantification Kit and Agilent TapeStation.
    Agilent TapeStation
    suggested: (Agilent TapeStation Laptop, RRID:SCR_019547)
    (10X Genomics) and further analysed using the Seurat v3.1.4 package (Butler et al. 2018) in R v3.6 (https://www.r-project.org/).
    Seurat
    suggested: (SEURAT, RRID:SCR_007322)
    https://www.r-project.org/
    suggested: (R Project for Statistical Computing, RRID:SCR_001905)
    Statistical significance was calculated by performing Student’s t-test using GraphPad Prism.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • No conflict of interest statement was detected. If there are no conflicts, we encourage authors to explicit state so.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.