The level of liver and renal function biomarker abnormalities among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Ethiopia

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented public health emergency and added burden to developing countries. The pandemic cause multi organ failures (MOF) predominantly affects lung, cardiac, renal and liver organs as severity of the disease exacerbates. That is the rationale to execute this study with the aim to determine the magnitude of abnormal organ function test parameters and its association between markers of organ failure and disease severity in patients infected with COVID-19 admitted at Millennium COVID-19 Care Center (CCC).

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among COVID-19 patients admitted at Millennium COVID-19 Care and Treatment Center (MCCTC) from May 2021 up to Oct 2021. In this study 500 participant’s information were collected from the laboratory database of Millennium COVID-19 care center. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. P-value <0.05 was considered significantly associated.

Result

The median age of the 500 study participants was 55.6±7.7 years, and from these 67.6% of patients were males. Liver function parameters Aspartae transferase (AST),) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Alakaline phosphatase (ALP) the mean value of overall patients were elevated and three of these parameters were highly elevated among critical patients (56.9±57.7, 58.5±6, and 114.6±6) respectively. All study participants had an elevated Creatinine. 66.8% males, 65% Intensive care unit (ICU), had an elevated serum value of ALT and AST respectively. Troponin was found elevated among males (54%) and 59% among ICU (critical) patients.

Conclusion

Liver and renal function test biomarkers such as creatine kinase muscle-brain isoenzymes (CK-MB), troponin, AST, ALT and Creatinine serum value was found elevated among ICU than non ICU patients. Organ function biomarkers are a candidate for predicting COVID-19 disease severity in order to guide clinical care.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.15.22271010: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Data was collected after permission was obtained.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical Analysis: SPSS statistical software package version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.