Excess COVID-19-associated deaths among the unvaccinated population ≥18 years old in the United States, May 30 – December 4, 2021

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were authorized at the end of 2020 and are effective in preventing deaths; however, many persons remain unvaccinated. Using weekly publicly available CDC data of COVID-19-associated death rates by age and vaccination status from 26 US jurisdictions, we estimated the number of excess deaths that might have been averted by vaccination among unvaccinated persons ≥ 18 years old from May 30 to December 4, 2021. We subtracted the death rate in the vaccinated from rates in the unvaccinated to estimate the death rate each week that could be attributable to non-vaccination and multiplied this rate difference by the number of people in the unvaccinated group for each age group and each week, to estimate the excess mortality among the unvaccinated. Then, we extrapolated the number of deaths due to non-vaccination in the 26 jurisdictions to the whole US population using 2020 census estimates. In the 26 participating jurisdictions there were an estimated 83,400 excess deaths among the unvaccinated from May 30 to December 4, 2021. The largest number of excess deaths occurred in those 65–79 years old (n=28,900; 34.7% of total), followed by those 50-64 years old (n=25,900; 31.1%). Extrapolated to the US population we estimated approximately 135,000 excess deaths during the study period in persons ≥18 years old. Our estimates are an underestimate of all excess deaths that have occurred since vaccine became available because our analysis period was limited to May 30 to December 4, 2021, and many excess deaths occurred before and after this period. In summary, we used retrospective data to estimate the substantial number of COVID-19-associated deaths among the unvaccinated illustrating the importance of vaccination to prevent further unnecessary mortality during this pandemic.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.10.22270823: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.