The rise and fall of SARS-CoV-2 variants and the emergence of competing Omicron lineages

  1. Tanner Wiegand
  2. Aidan McVey
  3. Anna Nemudraia
  4. Artem Nemudryi
  5. Blake Wiedenheft

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

In late December of 2019, high throughput sequencing technologies enabled rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 as the etiological agent of COVID-19, and global sequencing efforts are now a critical tool for monitoring the ongoing spread and evolution of this virus. Here, we analyze a subset (n=83,204) of all publicly available SARS-CoV-2 genomes (n=~5.6 million) that were randomly selected, but equally distributed over the course of the pandemic. We plot the emergence and extinction of new variants of concern (VOCs) over time and show how this corresponds to the ongoing accumulation of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 genomes and individual proteins. While the accumulation of mutations generally follows a linear regression, non-synonymous mutations are significantly greater in Omicron viruses than in previous variants–especially in the spike and nucleoproteins–and these differences are more pronounced in a recently identified sub-lineage (BA.2) of Omicron.

Importance

Omicron is the fifth SARS-CoV-2 variant to be designated a Variant of Concern (VOC) by the World Health Organization (WHO). Here we provide a retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants and explain how the Omicron variant is distinct. Our work shows that the spike and nucleoproteins have accumulated the most mutations in Omicron variants, but that the accessory proteins of SARS-CoV-2 sequences are changing most rapidly relative to their size. Collectively, this “Observation” provides a concise overview of SARS-CoV-2 evolution, reveals mutational differences between two Omicron lineages, and highlights changes in the SARS-CoV-2 proteome that have been under reported.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.09.479842: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • No conflict of interest statement was detected. If there are no conflicts, we encourage authors to explicit state so.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2022.02.09.479842v1 on bioRxiv