USA Winter 2021 CoVID-19 Resurgence Post-Christmas Update

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

We have successfully modeled every USA CoVID-19 wave using: where N ( t ) is the total number of new CoVID-19 cases above a prior baseline, and t R sets the doubling time t dbl = t R (ln 2). The new parameters { α S ; δ o } measure mitigation efforts among the uninfected population , with { α S > 0} being associated with Social Distancing and vaccinations ; while { δ o > 0 }is associated with mask-wearing , which gives a faster post-peak drop-off . The predicted pandemic wave end is when N ( t ) no longer increases.

Using data from 11/15/21-12/30/21, our prior medrxiv . org preprint* showed this initial Omicron CoVID-19 wave had values that matched the initial stage of the prior USA Winter 2020 resurgence { t R ≈8 05 days ; α S ≈ 0 011 / day }, when practically no one was vaccinated. In addition, this initial Winter 2021 wave showed virtually no mask-wearing { δ o ≈ × 0 001 10 −3 / day }, making it capable of infecting virtually everyone. These parameter values indicated that the Omicron variant was likely evading the vaccines in people who thought they were protected.

As a result, stopping the Omicron CoVID-19 spread must once again rely on enhanced Social Distancing and mask-wearing , just like the initial pandemic wave in March 2020. Analyzing the USA follow-on data from 12/25/21-1/31/22 shows that people did exactly that after the Christmas Holiday season, resulting in the following model parameters and values: for this wave by itself, with all prior waves subtracted out as a baseline. Combining all the USA CoVID-19 waves gives these updated totals: assuming no future CoVID-19 Resurgence ( with 4 Figures ).

*(10 . 1101_2021 . 10 . 15 . 21265078)

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.04.22270491: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.