A model-based approach to improve intranasal sprays for respiratory viral infections
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Drug delivery for viral respiratory infections, such as SARS-CoV-2, can be enhanced significantly by targeting the nasopharynx, which is the dominant initial infection site in the upper airway, for example by nasal sprays. However, under the standard recommended spray usage protocol (“Current Use”, or CU), the nozzle enters the nose almost vertically, resulting in sub-optimal deposition of drug droplets at the nasopharynx. Using computational fluid dynamics simulations in two anatomic nasal geometries, along with experimental validation of the generic findings in a different third subject, we have identified a new “Improved Use” (or, IU) spray protocol. It entails pointing the spray bottle at a shallower angle (almost horizontally), aiming slightly toward the cheeks. We have simulated the performance of this protocol for conically injected spray droplet sizes of 1 – 24 μ m, at two breathing rates: 15 and 30 L/min. The lower flowrate corresponds to resting breathing and follows a viscous-laminar model; the higher rate, standing in for moderate breathing conditions, is turbulent and is tracked via Large Eddy Simulation. The results show that (a) droplets sized between ∼ 6 – 14 μ m are most efficient at direct landing over the nasopharyngeal viral infection hot-spot; and (b) targeted drug delivery via IU outperforms CU by approximately 2 orders-of-magnitude, under the two tested inhalation conditions. Also quite importantly, the improved delivery strategy, facilitated by the IU protocol, is found to be robust to small perturbations in spray direction, underlining the practical utility of this simple change in nasal spray administration protocol.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.26.22269854: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Experimental validation of computationally predicted spray performance: To extract a sense of real spray performance that could be projected from the in silico framework, we linked the computationally predicted nasopharyngeal droplet deposition efficiencies with the size distribution of droplets (see Fig. 5) in two actual over-the-counter spray products: Flonase™ Flonase™suggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An …SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.26.22269854: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Experimental validation of computationally predicted spray performance: To extract a sense of real spray performance that could be projected from the in silico framework, we linked the computationally predicted nasopharyngeal droplet deposition efficiencies with the size distribution of droplets (see Fig. 5) in two actual over-the-counter spray products: Flonase™ Flonase™suggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
