Covaxin (BBV152) Vaccine Neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BBV152/Covaxin is well-tolerated and was shown to be 77.8% efficacious against symptomatic and 93.4% efficacious against severe symptomatic COVID-19 disease in adults. Previous studies have shown that sera from Covaxin vaccinated individuals have neutralizing activity against B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), B.1.617.2 (Delta), B.1.1.28 (Zeta), and B.1.617.1 (Kappa) SARS-CoV-2 variants. The B.1.1.529 variant (Omicron) recently emerged in November 2021 and has spread throughout the world. The Omicron variant has more than 30 mutations within the spike protein that could impact vaccine-mediated immunity. We used a live virus neutralization assay to evaluate the neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant of sera collected from subjects who received a booster dose (6-month after primary series last dose) of Covaxin. We found that sera from Covaxin boosted individuals showed neutralizing activity against D614G (vaccine strain), Delta, and Omicron variants. One hundred percent of boosted subjects showed neutralizing activity against the Delta variant while over 90% of boosted subjects showed neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant. These findings show that a booster dose of Covaxin can generate robust neutralizing antibody responses against the Omicron variant.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.24.22269189: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationIn the ongoing phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04471519) the protocol was amended after six months to re-consent and randomize previously vaccinated participants to receive a third dose (booster) of Covaxin on Day 215.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Cells were incubated with an anti-SARS-CoV spike primary antibody directly conjugated to Alexa-flour-647 (CR3022-AF647) overnight at 4°C.
    anti-SARS-CoV spike
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    The D614G, B.1.617.2, and B.1.1.529 viruses were isolated and propagated on Vero-TMPRSS2 cells as previously described.
    Vero-TMPRSS2
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1818, RRID:CVCL_YQ48)
    The antibody-virus mixture was added to VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour.
    VeroE6-TMPRSS2
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The FRNT50 titers were interpolated using a 4-parameter nonlinear regression in GraphPad Prism 9.2.0.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04471519Active, not recruitingWhole-Virion Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (BBV152) for COV…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.