Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.21.22269633: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsField Sample Permit: The studies were conducted at Istituto Clinico Humanitas and comprised a longitudinal sample collection, including healthcare workers (n=160) and cancer patients (n=30) and a cross-sectional sample collection, including elderly subjects (n=37), patients with rheumatic diseases (n=48) and patients in hemodialysis (n=53).
    Consent: Study inclusion criteria included a vaccination with an authorized COVID-19 vaccine (according to Italian regulation and guidelines), age of 18 years or greater, and willingness and ability to provide informed consent.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    BlindingExperiments were conducted in a blinded fashion with designated members of the clinical team, who did not run the assays, having access to the sample key until data were collected, at which point researchers of the team were unblinded.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Study design: We tested the IgG antibody response, the CD4 and CD8 T cell activation and the neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein developed after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Spikevax or Moderna mRNA-1273 – Comirnaty or BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech) as a part of two observational studies approved by the Ethical Committee of Istituto Clinico Humanitas, in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles.
    CD4
    suggested: None
    Following the definition of the WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin (NIBSC 20:136), the readout was updated and the assay currently calculates the levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in binding antibody units (BAU/mL) (Perkmann et al., 2021).
    anti-SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    SARS-CoV-2 IgG
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Data analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism version 8.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

    Read the original source
    Was this evaluation helpful?