Molecular basis of broad neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 variants including Omicron by a human antibody

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Omicron, a newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant, carried a large number of mutations in the spike protein leading to an unprecedented evasion from many neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). Here, we performed a head-to-head comparison of Omicron with other existing highly evasive variants in terms of their reduced sensitivities to antibodies, and found that Omicron variant is significantly more evasive than Beta and Mu variants. Of note, some key mutations occur in the conserved epitopes identified previously, especially in the binding sites of Class 4 nAbs, contributing to the increased Ab evasion. We also reported a broadly nAb (bnAb), VacW-209, which effectively neutralized all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants and even SARS-CoV. Finally, we determined six cryo-electron microscopy structures of VacW-209 complexed with the spike ectodomains of wild-type, Delta, Mu, C.1.2, Omicron, and SARS-CoV, and revealed the molecular basis of the broadly neutralizing activities of VacW-209 against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Overall, Omicron has once again raised the alarm over virus variation with significantly compromised neutralization. BnAbs targeting more conserved epitopes among variants will continue to play a key role in pandemic control and prevention.

One sentence summary

Structural and functional analyses reveal that a human antibody named VacW-209 confers broad neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 variants including Omicron by recognizing a highly conserved epitope.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.19.476892: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 20. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.