Structures of the Omicron spike trimer with ACE2 and an anti-Omicron antibody: mechanisms for the high infectivity, immune evasion and antibody drug discovery
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly become the dominant infective strain and the focus efforts against the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Here we report an extensive set of structures of the Omicron spike trimer by its own or in complex with ACE2 and an anti-Omicron antibody. These structures reveal that most Omicron mutations are located on the surface of the spike protein, which confer stronger ACE2 binding by nearly 10 folds but become inactive epitopes resistant to many therapeutic antibodies. Importantly, both RBD and the closed conformation of the Omicron spike trimer are thermodynamically unstable, with the melting temperature of the Omicron RBD decreased by as much as 7°C, making the spiker trimer prone to random open conformations. An unusual RBD-RBD interaction in the ACE2-spike complex unique to Omicron is observed to support the open conformation and ACE2 binding, serving the basis for the higher infectivity of Omicron. A broad-spectrum therapeutic antibody JMB2002, which has completed Phase 1 clinical trial, is found to interact with the same two RBDs to inhibit ACE2 binding, in a mode that is distinguished from all previous antibodies, thus providing the structural basis for the potent inhibition of Omicron by this antibody. Together with biochemical data, our structures provide crucial insights into higher infectivity, antibody evasion and inhibition of Omicron.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.27.474273: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.27.474273: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on pages 17, 19 and 15. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
-