Structure prediction of the druggable fragments in SARS-CoV-2 untranslated regions
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to intensive studies of both the structure and replication mechanism of SARS-CoV-2. In spite of some secondary structure experiments being carried out, the 3D structure of the key function regions of the viral RNA has not yet been well understood. At the beginning of COVID-19 breakout, RNA-Puzzles community attempted to envisage the three-dimensional structure of 5′- and 3′-Un-Translated Regions (UTRs) of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Here, we report the results of this prediction challenge, presenting the methodologies developed by six participating groups and discussing 100 RNA 3D models (60 models of 5′-UTR and 40 of 3′-UTR) predicted through applying both human experts and automated server approaches. We describe the original protocol for the reference-free comparative analysis of RNA 3D structures designed especially for this challenge. We elaborate on the deduced consensus structure and the reliability of the predicted structural motifs. All the computationally simulated models, as well as the development and the testing of computational tools dedicated to 3D structure analysis, are available for further study.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.17.473170: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Based on the multiple secondary structure alignments, conservation logos were prepared using the WebLogo integrating script (Crooks et al. 2004). WebLogosuggested: (WEBLOGO, RRID:SCR_010236)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.17.473170: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Based on the multiple secondary structure alignments, conservation logos were prepared using the WebLogo integrating script (Crooks et al. 2004). WebLogosuggested: (WEBLOGO, RRID:SCR_010236)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 39. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
