Sentimental Tweets Classification of Symptomatic COVID-19

  1. P Tharun

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

The approach I described is straightforward, related to COVID-19 SARS based tweets and the symptoms, that people tweet about. Also, social media mining for health application reports was shared in many different tasks of 2021. The motto at the back of this observe is to analyses tweets of COVID-19 based symptoms. By performing BERT model and text classification with XLNET with which uses to classify text and purpose of the texts (i.e.) tweets. So that I can get a deep understanding of the texts. When developing the system, I used two models the XLNet and DistilBERT for the text sorting task, but the outcome was XLNET out-performs the given approach to the best accuracy achieved. Now I discover a whole lot vital for as it should be categorizing tweets as encompassing self-said COVID-19 indications. Whether or not a tweets associated with COVID-19 is a non-public report or an information point out to the virus. Which gives test accuracy to an F1 score of 96%.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.15.472745: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2021.12.15.472745v1 on bioRxiv