Vaccine breakthrough and the invasion dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Vaccination provides a powerful tool for mitigating and controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. However, a number of factors reduce these potential benefits. The first problem arises from heterogeneities in vaccine supply and uptake: from global inequities in vaccine distribution, to local variations in uptake derived from vaccine hesitancy. The second complexity is biological: though several COVID-19 vaccines offer substantial protection against infection and disease, ‘breakthrough’ reinfection of vaccinees (and subsequent retransmission from these individuals) can occur, driven especially by new viral variants. Here, using a simple epidemiological model, we show that the combination of infection of remaining susceptible individuals and breakthrough infections of vaccinees can have significant effects in promoting infection of invading variants, even when vaccination rates are high and onward transmission from vaccinees relatively weak. Elaborations of the model show how heterogeneities in immunity and mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated sub-populations modulate these effects, underlining the importance of quantifying these variables. Overall, our results indicate that high vaccination coverage still leaves no room for complacency if variants are circulating that can elude immunity, even if this happens at very low rates.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.13.21267725: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter:…
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.13.21267725: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
