The impact of remote home monitoring of people with COVID-19 using pulse oximetry: A national population and observational study

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.10.21267613: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Since we were using combinations of aggregated data and datasets for which we already had approval to use, no ethics committee approval was needed for this analysis.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationUsing rounded data: To accommodate the uncertainty caused by the rounding of the onboarding data, we ran all our statistical models multiple times, each time randomly sampling onboarded numbers from the range of feasible values (treating the distributions as uniform).
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.19 Patient and Public Involvement: Members of the study team met to discuss the study with service users and public members of the NIHR BRACE Health and Care Panel and patient representatives from NIHR RSET.
    SAS
    suggested: (SASqPCR, RRID:SCR_003056)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Firstly, limitations in data completeness meant that we were only able to analyse onboarding data for one quarter of CCGs across England. This, combined with lower than expected coverage within these CCGs, meant that our ability to detect any possible impact was smaller than anticipated. This also meant that some areas of the country were under-represented. Secondly, individual level associations may not have been seen at the aggregate level. Thirdly, qualitative findings from our wider study revealed that COVID oximetry @home was implemented in a variety of ways by different services within CCGs, some of which may have had more impact on outcomes than others.6 The possible impact of the intervention on hospital admissions was always uncertain, since the aim of the programme was to ensure people who needed hospital treatment were admitted at the right time. Also, once in hospital, the determinants of length of stay are complex and multifactorial, and may have varied during the time course of the second wave of COVID-19 infection in England. Strengths and limitations: The anticipated value of our approach with aggregated data was that it would complement the other two simultaneous quantitative evaluations of CO@h,10,11 could be carried out more rapidly and, if COVID-19 continues to stretch national health services, it could be more readily repeated as new data become available, provided the right information is routinely collected at source. We were able to handle small number...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.