SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern remain dependent on IFITM2 for efficient replication in human lung cells

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

The authors have withdrawn this manuscript due to a duplicate posting of manuscript number BIORXIV/2021/468942. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.06.471527: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationFirst, 1 µl random hexamers (50 ng/µl), 1 µl dNTPs mix (10 mM each), and 11 µl template RNA (diluted 1:10 in DNase/RNase free water) were mixed, incubated at 65°C for 5 min and placed on ice for 1 min.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Proteins were stained using primary antibodies against IFITM1 (α- IFITM1, Cell Signaling Cat#13126S, 1:1,000), IFITM2 (α-IFITM2 Cell Signaling Cat#13530 S, 1:1,000), IFITM3 (α-IFITM3 Cell Signaling Cat#59212S, 1:1,000), ACE2 (Rabbit polyclonal anti-ACE2 Abcam, Cat#ab166755, 1:1,000); rat anti-GAPDH (Biolegend Cat#607902, 1:1,000) and SARS CoV-2 N (anti-SARS-CoV-2 N Sino Biologicals Cat#40588- V08B, 1:1,000) and Infrared Dye labeled secondary antibodies (LI-COR IRDye).
    IFITM1
    suggested: None
    IFITM2
    suggested: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 13530, RRID:AB_2798248)
    α-IFITM2
    suggested: None
    IFITM3
    suggested: None
    α-IFITM3
    suggested: None
    anti-ACE2
    suggested: None
    anti-GAPDH
    suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 607902, RRID:AB_2734503)
    anti-SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Caco-2 cells (human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma, kindly provided by Prof. Holger Barth (Ulm University)) were grown in the same media as Vero E6 cells but with supplementation of 10% heat-inactivated FBS.
    Caco-2
    suggested: None
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    6 h after the second transfection, Calu-3 cells were infected with the various SARS-CoV-2 variants at an MOI of 0.05.
    Calu-3
    suggested: BCRJ Cat# 0264, RRID:CVCL_0609)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The mapped reads and the pileup file were used to construct the consensus sequence with the iVar package(40) using default settings.
    iVar
    suggested: None
    Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.