Characterization of the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Protein and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) as a Potential Therapeutic Target

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is an emerging virus from the Coronaviridae family and is responsible for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In this work, we explored the previously reported SARS-CoV-2 structural membrane protein (M) interaction with human Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA). The M protein is responsible for maintaining virion shape, and PCNA is a marker of DNA damage which is essential for DNA replication and repair. We validated the M PCNA interaction through immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence co-localization, and a PLA assay. In cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 or transfected with M protein, using immunofluorescence and cell fractioning, we documented a reallocation of PCNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and the increase of PCNA and γH2AX (another DNA damage marker) expression. We also observed an increase of PCNA and γH2AX expression in the lung of a COVID-19 patient by immunohistochemistry. In addition, the inhibition of PCNA translocation by PCNA I1 and Verdinexor led to a reduction of plaque formation in an in vitro assay. We, therefore, propose that the transport of PCNA to the cytoplasm and its association with M could be a virus strategy to manipulate cell functions and may be considered a target for COVID-19 therapy.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.06.471464: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: The use of this material for research purposes has been previously approved by the Institutional Ethical Board CAAE #30364720.0.0000.0068)
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The samples were diluted with lysis buffer without inhibitors and incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-PCNA antibody (1:500, #2586, Cell signaling) under mild agitation.
    anti-PCNA
    suggested: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2586, RRID:AB_2160343)
    The secondary antibodies used were: Alexa-Fluor-594 Goat anti-Rabbit (Jackson ImmunoResearch #711-585-152),
    anti-Rabbit
    suggested: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 711-585-152, RRID:AB_2340621)
    Briefly, cells were blocked and stained with primary antibodies (anti-FLAG 1:400 - Sigma F7425 and anti-PCNA 1:400 – Sta Cruz sc-56) and PLA probes (anti-mouse MINUS - DUO92004 and anti-rabbit PLUS - DUO92002).
    anti-FLAG
    suggested: None
    anti-mouse MINUS - DUO92004
    suggested: None
    anti-rabbit PLUS - DUO92002
    suggested: None
    Membranes were blocked for one hour at room temperature (RT) with 5% non-fat powdered milk dissolved in TBS-Tween-20 (TBS-T) (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 0.1% Tween-20), incubated overnight (4°C) with primary antibodies and with secondary antibodies against mouse or rabbit IgG conjugated with peroxidase (Amersham) for one hour at RT.
    rabbit IgG
    suggested: None
    The following antibodies were used: anti-PCNA (#2586); anti-γH2AX (#9718); anti-β-actin (#4967) (Cell Signaling), anti-α-tubulin (CP06) (Calbiochem) Immunohistochemistry: Lung tissue sections, obtained via Minimally Invasive Autopsies,
    anti-γH2AX
    suggested: None
    anti-β-actin ( #4967 ) ( Cell Signaling) , anti-α-tubulin ( CP06
    suggested: None
    anti-α-tubulin
    suggested: (Millipore Cat# CP06, RRID:AB_2617116)
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Viral infections were performed in Vero cells seeded in 24-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well) for the experiments with treatments and immunofluorescence assays, and six-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well) for Western blots.
    Vero
    suggested: None
    Immunoprecipitation: For anti-FLAG immunoprecipitation, HEK293T cells cultivated in 100 mm diameter dishes expressing the FLAG-tagged GFP, E, M, and N proteins were washed twice with PBS and harvested by pipetting up and down in PBS after 48 hours.
    HEK293T
    suggested: None
    Western blotting: The proteins were collected from Vero E6 and HEK293 cells using a cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton x-100, and protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail).
    HEK293
    suggested: None
    Briefly, after seeding, Vero E6 (8 × 105 cells per well, 6-well plates) were incubated overnight and infected with 200 PFU per well.
    Vero E6
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Cloning: To do the FLAG-tagged protein expression, a modified pcDNA 3.1 (+) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was generated by cloning the FLAG peptide coding sequence upstream of the multiple cloning sites, using the NheI and BamHI restriction sites and generating the pcDNA-FLAG vector 60.
    pcDNA 3.1
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_20407)
    pcDNA-FLAG
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_60940)
    The full-length of M, N, and E genes were codon-optimized, synthesized (Geneart-Thermo Fisher Scientific), and cloned into pcDNA-FLAG, generating plasmid pFLAG-M, pFLAG-N, and pFLAG-E.
    pFLAG-N
    suggested: None
    pFLAG-E
    suggested: None
    Subcellular Fractionation: Vero E6 cells were seeded at 8×106 in a P100 plate and transfected with pFLAG-GFP or pFLAG-M.
    pFLAG-GFP
    suggested: None
    The quantification was performed by BCA. Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA.): For PLA protocol, Vero E6 cells were grown on chambered slides at a confluency of 70% and transfected with pFLAG-M.
    pFLAG-M
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    To quantify the signal on immunofluorescences we used the ImageJ software to transform the images in 8 bit (grayscale), and check-in Set Measurements the options: Area and Integrated density; select an ROI of nuclei area (Hoechst staining) to determinate the fluorescence signal on nuclei; the cytoplasmatic fluorescence signal was obtained by a total cell - nuclei area ROI.
    ImageJ
    suggested: (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.