Testing the validity of the modified vaccine attitude question battery across 22 languages with a large-scale international survey dataset: within the context of COVID-19 vaccination
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.06.21267289: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: COVIDiSTRESSII project was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at University of Salford. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The whole English version dataset was randomly separated into two subsets, one for EFA (50%) and one for CFA (50%), to prevent overfitting. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.06.21267289: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: COVIDiSTRESSII project was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at University of Salford. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The whole English version dataset was randomly separated into two subsets, one for EFA (50%) and one for CFA (50%), to prevent overfitting. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-