A modified porous silicon microparticle promotes mucosal delivery of SARS-CoV-2 antigen and induction of potent and durable systemic and mucosal T helper 1 skewed protective immunity
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Development of optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to induce potent, long-lasting immunity and provide cross-reactive protection against emerging variants remains a high priority. Here, we report that a modified porous silicon microparticle (mPSM)-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) vaccine activated dendritic cells and generated more potent and durable SARS-CoV-2-specific systemic humoral and type 1 helper T (Th) cell-mediated immune responses than alum-formulated RBD following parenteral vaccination, and protected mice from SARS-CoV-2 and Beta variant infection. mPSM facilitated the uptake of SARS-CoV-2 RBD antigens by nasal and airway epithelial cells. Parenteral and intranasal prime and boost vaccinations with mPSM-RBD elicited potent systemic and lung resident memory T and B cells and SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA responses, and markedly diminished viral loads and inflammation in the lung following SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infection. Our results suggest that mPSM can serve as potent adjuvant for SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccine which is effective for systemic and mucosal vaccination.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.11.22.469576: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IACUC: All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees at UTMB and Houston Methodist Academic Institute, respectively. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Cells were harvested and stained with antibodies for cell surface markers, including CD80 or CD86 antibodies (BioLegend), and acquired by a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). CD80suggested: NoneCD86suggested: NoneThis will be followed by a 1 h incubation with biotinylated HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG subtype antibodies (Southern Biotech). … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.11.22.469576: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IACUC: All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees at UTMB and Houston Methodist Academic Institute, respectively. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Cells were harvested and stained with antibodies for cell surface markers, including CD80 or CD86 antibodies (BioLegend), and acquired by a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). CD80suggested: NoneCD86suggested: NoneThis will be followed by a 1 h incubation with biotinylated HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG subtype antibodies (Southern Biotech). 3,3’,5,5’ tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, BD Biosciences) were added to the well for 15 min and reactions were stopped by sulfuric acid. anti-mouse IgGsuggested: NoneFor IgA measurement, goat anti-mouse IgA (Southern Biotech) coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was added as the secondary antibody at a 1:2000 dilution for 1 h at 37C, followed by adding TMB (3, 3, 5, 5’-tetramethylbenzidine) peroxidase substrate (Thermo Scientific) for about 15 min. anti-mouse IgAsuggested: NoneCells were stained with antibodies for CD3, CD4, or CD8, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.5% saponin before adding anti-IFN-γ, or control rat IgG1 (e-Biosciences). CD3suggested: NoneCD4suggested: NoneCD8suggested: Noneanti-IFN-γ,suggested: Nonerat IgG1suggested: NoneAfter blocking with 1% BSA plus 5% FBS, cells were incubated with anti-EEA1 antibody (1:500, Abcam) at 4°C overnight, followed by staining with AF488 -labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution, ThermoFisher) at room temperature for 2 h. anti-EEA1suggested: Noneanti-rabbitsuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources The vector was then packaged into lentivirus to transduce 293FT cells. 293FTsuggested: NoneViruses: SARS-CoV-2 Beta variant, and Delta variant were obtained from the World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses (WRCEVA) at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) and were amplified twice in Vero E6 cells. Vero E6suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)Vero CCL-81 cells (1.2 ×104) in 50 μl of DMEM containing 2% FBS were seeded in each well of black μCLEAR flat-bottom 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-one™). CCL-81suggested: NoneThe virus-serum mixture was transferred to the Vero CCL-81 cell plate with the final multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5. Vero CCL-81suggested: NoneExperimental Models: Organisms/Strains Sentences Resources Mice: 6-week-old BALB/c mice, C57BL/(B)6 mice, and K18 hACE2 mice (stock #034860) were purchased from Jackson Lab. C57BL/suggested: NoneBriefly, BM cells isolated from BALB/c mice were cultured for 6 days in medium supplemented with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-4 (Peprotech) to generate DCs. BALB/csuggested: RRID:IMSR_APB:4790)Recombinant DNA Sentences Resources Vaccine preparation: To express and purify the RBD protein, the amino acid residues of 319 to 541 of SARS-CoV-2 S protein were cloned into the lentivirus vector, pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1α-RFP (System Biosciences). pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1α-RFPsuggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences). FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)The plates were washed and scanned using an ImmunoSpot 6.0 analyzer and analyzed by ImmunoSpot software to determine the spot-forming cells (SFC) per 106 splenocytes. ImmunoSpotsuggested: NoneStatistical analysis: Values for viral load, cytokine production, antibody titers, and T cell response experiments were compared using Prism software (GraphPad) statistical analysis and were presented as means ± SEM. Prismsuggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)GraphPadsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
