Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Modeling for Continuous Surveillance of COVID-19 Outbreak
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Using wastewater surveillance as a continuous pooled sampling technique has been in place in many countries since the early stages of the outbreak of COVID-19. Since the beginning of the outbreak, many research works have emerged, studying different aspects of viral SARS-CoV-2 DNA concentrations (viral load) in wastewater and its potential as an early warning method. However, one of the questions that has remained unanswered is the quantitative relation between viral load and clinical indicators such as daily cases, deaths, and hospitalizations. Few studies have tried to couple viral load data with an epidemiological model to relate the number of infections in the community to the viral burden. This paper proposes a stochastic wastewater-based SEIR model to showcase the importance of viral load in the early detection and prediction of an outbreak in a community. We built three models based on whether or not they use the case count and viral load data and compared their simulations and forecasting quality. Our results demonstrate that a simple SEIR model based on viral load data can reliably predict the number of infections in the future. Therefore, wastewater-based surveillance is a promising way of monitoring the spread of COVID-19 and can provide city officials with timely information about the circulation of COVID-19 in the community.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.10.19.21265221: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank…
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.10.19.21265221: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
