Design of Peptide Vaccine for COVID19: CD8+ and CD4+ T cell epitopes from SARS-CoV-2 open-reading-frame protein variants

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, has challenged public health at an unprecedented scale which has led to a dramatic loss of human life worldwide. To design a protective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, it is necessary to understand which SARS-CoV-2 specific epitopes can elicit a T cell response and provide protection across a broad population. In this study, PLpro and RdRp, two immunogenic non-structural proteins from an immunodominant gene region ORF1ab, as well as ORF3a and ORF9b are identified as potential vaccine targets against SARS-CoV-2. To select top epitopes for vaccine design, we used various clinical properties, such as antigenicity, allergenicity, toxicity and IFN-y secretion. The analysis of CD8 and CD4 T cell epitopes revealed multiple potential vaccine constructs that cover a high percentage of the world population. We identified 8 immunogenic, antigenic, non-allergenic, non-toxic, stable and IFN-y inducing CD8 proteins for nsp3, 4 for nsp12, 11 for ORF3a and 3 for ORF9b that are common across four lineages of variants of concern – B.1.1.7, P.1, B.1.351 and B.1.617.2, which protect 98.12%, 87.08%, 96.07% and 63.8% of the world population, respectively. We also identified variant specific T cell epitopes that could be useful in targeting each variant strain separately. Including the prediction of mouse MHC affinity towards our top CD8 epitopes, our study revealed a total of 3 immunogenic, antigenic, non-allergenic, non-toxic, stable and IFN-y inducing CD8 epitopes overlapping with 6 antigenic, non-allergenic, non-toxic, stable and IFN-y inducing CD4 epitopes across all four variants of concern which can effectively be utilized in pre-clinical studies. The landscape of SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes that we identified can help lead SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development as well as epitope-based peptide vaccine research in the future.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.21.461301: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Retrieval of variant sequences: The lineages of variants of concern, UK B.1.1.7 [38], South African B.1.351 [39], Brazilian P.1 [40] and Indian B.1.617.2 [41], were used to identify the most prevalent mutations for nsp3, nsp12, ORF3a and ORF9b that would be present in at least 75% of the sequences [42] (Table 1).
    B.1.617.2
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Two common mouse strains to study COVID-19 vaccines, C57BL/6 and BALB/CJ, were used in mouse HLA affinity predictions.
    C57BL/6
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Retrieval of SARS-CoV-2 sequence: The reference protein sequences of SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan isolate were retrieved from NCBI database using accession number NC_045512.
    NCBI
    suggested: (NCBI, RRID:SCR_006472)
    Antigenicity, allergenicity and toxicity evaluation: Antigenicity was evaluated by VaxiJen 2.0 [47] server with a threshold of 0.4, allergenicity by AllerTop v2.0 [48] and toxicity by ToxinPred [49].
    VaxiJen
    suggested: (VaxiJen, RRID:SCR_018514)
    AllerTop
    suggested: (AllerTop, RRID:SCR_018496)
    Hence, various chemical and physical parameters associated with the vaccine were predicted in this study using ProtParam tool on ExPASy [50].
    ProtParam
    suggested: (ProtParam Tool, RRID:SCR_018087)
    ExPASy
    suggested: None
    The native peptides from the RCSB structures were replaced with our predicted epitopes using PyMol.
    PyMol
    suggested: (PyMOL, RRID:SCR_000305)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    A limitation of current studies relates to mutational spectra of SARS-CoV-2 that is constantly changing. This poses a risk to the vaccine candidates to no longer being viable to offer protection against newly formed variants. To overcome this, we selected the most prevalent variants of concern and their most common mutations in nsp3, nsp12, ORF3a and ORF9b proteins across all identified sequences to date. The selected proteins may carry some important mutations that increase the transmissibility and survival of the virus, like the nonsynonymous mutation P323L in nsp12 which has possibly affected the catalytic activity of the nsp12 protein, therefore altering the binding capability with other cofactors, such as nsp7 and nsp8 proteins [65]. However, studies have reported generally low mutation rates in these proteins which increase the efficiency of the proposed multi-epitope vaccine candidates in the long term [66]. Another challenge with peptide vaccines is that peptides can be easily degraded by peptidases which causes a lower T cell response. The present study addresses this issue by calculating the half-life of the top common epitopes to make sure that the vaccine construct is not degraded early in blood.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.