Geographic and Phylodynamic Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 from Environmental Origin
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread globally. Understanding the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the environment is essential for infection control policies. This study aims to provide a phylodynamic analysis and distribution pattern of SARS-CoV-2 from the environment in terms of Source, clades, lineages, and their location. Ninety (90) retrieved whole-genome sequences of environmental sources from GISAID were investigated to determine the evolutionary process of SARS-CoV-2 and mutation in the isolated nucleotide sequences. The analysis was carried out using R, MAFFT, and MEGA X software. Out of the five countries studied, Austria has the highest distribution with sixty-five samples (72.2%), and the highest isolates of 68 (75.6%) were from raw sewage. The highest clade in circulation as obtained from the study is G with lineages B. The phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequences from Austria, the United States, China, Brazil, and Liechtenstein indicated that the SARS-CoV-2 viruses were all clustered together, irrespective of sequence geographic location. The study concluded by demonstrating a clear interconnection between the phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 isolates from various geographic locations, all of which were locked in the same cluster regardless of their environment specimen. Thus, depicting the possibility of their origination from a common ancestor.
Highlight
-
Environmental sources of specimen isolated from raw sewage have the highest occurring specimen sequence, while those from breathing air, door handle, and wastewater have the lowest sequence.
-
Environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 is of great importance to control the spread of the virus. Untreated raw sewage should be of more priority for the environmental surveillance of the virus.
-
Eighteen (18) nucleotide sequences from this study’s multiple sequence alignment shared a 90% similarity with the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome, indicating a common evolutionary origin.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.13.21263432: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Multiple sequence alignment and evolutionary Analysis: The complete genome sequences of 90 SARS-CoV-2 obtained were aligned using MAFFT version 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) against the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome (Accession number: NC_0455122), with all parameters set at default (Katoh et al., 2019; Kuraku et al., 2013). MAFFTsuggested: (MAFFT, RRID:SCR_011811)Based on the whole genome sequences, a maximum likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA X with 50 bootstraps resampling to ascertain the common antecedent among each strain (Tingting et al., 2020). MEGAsuggested: …SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.13.21263432: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Multiple sequence alignment and evolutionary Analysis: The complete genome sequences of 90 SARS-CoV-2 obtained were aligned using MAFFT version 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) against the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome (Accession number: NC_0455122), with all parameters set at default (Katoh et al., 2019; Kuraku et al., 2013). MAFFTsuggested: (MAFFT, RRID:SCR_011811)Based on the whole genome sequences, a maximum likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA X with 50 bootstraps resampling to ascertain the common antecedent among each strain (Tingting et al., 2020). MEGAsuggested: (Mega BLAST, RRID:SCR_011920)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-