Early immunologic response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients receiving biologics and/or immunomodulators

  1. Esteban Rodríguez-Martinó
  2. Rafael Medina-Prieto
  3. Jorge Santana-Bagur
  4. María Santé
  5. Petraleigh Pantoja
  6. Ana M. Espino
  7. Carlos A. Sariol
  8. Esther A. Torres

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Patients with immune conditions and immune-modifying therapies were excluded from the Covid-19 vaccine trials. Studies have shown conflicting response to different vaccines in persons receiving immune suppressors or biologics. The aim of this study is to evaluate humoral and cellular response to Covid-19 vaccines in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) using biologic and/or immunomodulatory (IMM) therapies.

Methods

Participants are adults with IBD receiving biologics or IMM planning to receive a Covid 19 vaccine. Cellular immunity (CD4+ and CD8+ T cell levels) with flow cytometry are measured at baseline and 2 weeks after each vaccine dose. Humoral immunity (antibody titers and neutralizing capacity,VNT%) is analyzed by ELISA at baseline, 2 weeks after each dose, and 6 and 12 months after vaccine. We present the early results of the first 19 subjects. The study is approved by the IRB.

Results

19 subjects (18 in biologics and 1 in IMM) who received 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are included. Total IgG antibodies increased 21.13 times after the first dose and 90 times after the second dose. VTN% increased 11.92 times after the first dose and 53.79 times after the second dose. When compared with a healthy control cohort, total IgG antibodies and VTN% were lower in the subjects after the first dose. After the second dose, IgG antibodies increased but remained lower than controls, but VTN% were similar to controls. CD4 and CD8 mean levels had an upward trend after vaccination.

Conclusions

Neutralizing capacity response to the vaccine in subjects was similar to a healthy cohort in spite of lower increases in total IgG antibodies. The CD4 and CD8 results observed may support the capacity to mount an effective cellular response in patients on biologics. Larger studies are needed to determine vaccine efficacy in these patients.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.11.21263211: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Limitations of the study include the small size of the population and the short follow-up period. Larger studies with longer follow up and comparison between biologics with different mechanisms of action are necessary to establish the efficacy of the vaccine in these patients.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2021.09.11.21263211v1 on medRxiv