Perceptions towards mask use in school children during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the Ciao Corona Study

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Background

Mask wearing contributes to the reduction of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In Switzerland, compulsory use of masks was introduced in indoor public spaces and later in schools. In the canton of Zurich, masks were introduced for secondary school children (grades 7-9) from November 2020, and for primary school children (grades 4-6) from February 2021– along with other protective measures against SARS-CoV-2. This study explored perceptions towards the usefulness of masks in school and public in a cohort of children and adolescents in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland, in January – May 2021.

Methods

School children aged 10 to 17 years enrolled in Ciao Corona , a prospective school-based cohort study, responded to nested online surveys between January 12 to March 24 2021 (Q1) and March 10 to May 16 2021 (Q2). Secondary school children were surveyed at Q1 and Q2, and primary school children at Q2 only. Surveys for parents and their children included questions on children’s perception of the usefulness of masks and mask wearing behavior. Associations between perceived usefulness of masks and child’s school level, gender, and parents’ educational attainment were analyzed with Pearson’s and McNemar’s chi-squared tests. Free-text comments provided by children were classified into categories of expressed attitude towards mask wearing.

Results

595 (54% girls) and 1118 (52% girls) school children responded to online questionnaires at Q1 and Q2, respectively. More than half of school children perceived masks to be useful at school (Q1:60% and Q2:57%) and in public (Q1:69% and Q2:60%). Girls perceived masks as useful more often than boys (at Q2 at school: 61% versus 53%, in public: 64% versus 57%), and children of parents with high educational attainment more often than those of parents with lower educational attainment (at Q2 at school: 61% versus 49%, in public: 63% versus 54%). There were no differences in the perceived usefulness of masks among children in primary versus secondary school. At Q1 and Q2 each, about 20% of children provided individual statements about masks, of which 36% at Q1 and 16% at Q2 reported side-effects and discomfort such as skin irritations, headache or difficulties breathing during physical education.

Conclusion

Approximately 60% of school children perceived masks at school and in public places as useful. A small but non-negligible proportion of children reported discomfort and side-effects that should be considered to ensure high adherence to mask wearing among school children.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04448717 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448717

CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIELD STATEMENT

Worldwide about 150 countries fully closed their schools at some point during the coronavirus pandemic, while other countries – such as Switzerland – kept schools open almost all the time. However, among other protective measures, children in secondary school (aged approximately 14-16 years) had to wear masks since November 2020, and older children in primary school (aged 11-13 years) – since February 2021.

As part of the large study Ciao Corona based in schools in Switzerland, we wanted to learn how children perceive the usefulness of masks in school and public. Children and their parents completed questionnaires in January-March (595 secondary school children) and March-May 2021 (1118 secondary and primary school children).

We found that about 60% of children perceived masks to be useful at school and in public. Girls perceived masks as useful more often than boys, and children of parents with university or college education more often than those of parents with lower education. About 7– 9% of children reported side-effects and discomfort such as skin irritations, headache or difficulties breathing during physical education. Although side-effects were not frequently reported, they should be considered to ensure high adherence to mask wearing among school children.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.04.21262907: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This study has a number of limitations. First, the online questionnaires nested within the Ciao Corona study were usually completed by parents/legal guardians. Parents were explicitly encouraged to complete the part of the questionnaires about masks together with their children or to let their child respond to these questions alone. Nevertheless, it is not entirely clear to what extent children’s perceptions towards masks were reported by children themselves, and thus captured correctly, as social desirability bias is possible. Second, children’s behaviour and perceptions are largely influenced by their parents’, teachers’, and peers’ beliefs and behaviour.37,38 Thus, it is also likely that parents who were skeptical towards certain restrictions and measures implemented during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not take part in the Ciao Corona study, and did not allow their children to participate, resulting in potential selection bias in the study population. Third, side-effects reported by some survey participants cannot be (clinically) verified and would require a different study design. Finally, our study sample consisted of a larger proportion of parents with high educational background (60% at Q1 and 71% at Q2) than would be expected in the general population.39 Consequently, our findings likely do not reflect the entire spectrum of perceptions about the usefulness of masks in the general population, and may to some extent overestimate the perceived value of masks in schools a...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04448717RecruitingLongitudinal Study of Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodie…


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.