Profile of Mucormycosis Cases from a Network of Hospitals in North India Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Incidence of mucormycosis suddenly surged in India after the second wave of COVID-19. This is a crippling disease and needs to be studied in detail to understand the disease, its course, and the outcomes.
Between 1 st March and 15 th July 2021, our network of hospitals in North India received a total of 155 cases of COVID-associated mucormycosis cases as all of them reported affliction by COVID-19 earlier or concurrent. Their records were retrieved from the Electronic Health Records system of the hospitals and their demographics, clinical features, treatments, and outcomes were studied. More than 80% (125 cases) had proven disease and the remaining 30 were categorized as ‘possible’ mucormycosis as per the EORTC criteria.
More than two-thirds (69.0%) of the cases were males and the mean age was 53 years for either sex. Nearly two-thirds (64.5%) had symptoms of nose and jaws and 42.6% had eye involvement. Some had multiple symptoms. As many as 78.7% had diabetes and 91.6% gave history of use of steroids during COVID-19 treatment. The primary surgery was functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (83.9%). Overall mortality was 16.8%, which is one-and-a-half times the mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the corresponding population. Occurrence of mucormycosis was associated with diabetes and use of steroids, but mortality was not associated with either of them. Cases undergoing surgery and on antifungal had steeply lower mortality (11.9% vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001) than those who were exclusively on antifungal drugs. Treatment by different drugs did not make much of a difference in mortality.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.25.21262404: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: Ethics Committee Approval and Consent: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Max Super Speciality Hospital (A unit of Devki Devi Foundation), Address : Service Floor, Office of Ethics Committee, East Block, next to Conference Room, Max Super Speciality Hospital,
Consent: All the admitted patients gave a prior consent for their anonymised data to be used for research purpose.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources All these cases gave history of COVID-19, diagnosed by RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or by an alternative method like rapid antigen test, … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.25.21262404: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: Ethics Committee Approval and Consent: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Max Super Speciality Hospital (A unit of Devki Devi Foundation), Address : Service Floor, Office of Ethics Committee, East Block, next to Conference Room, Max Super Speciality Hospital,
Consent: All the admitted patients gave a prior consent for their anonymised data to be used for research purpose.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources All these cases gave history of COVID-19, diagnosed by RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or by an alternative method like rapid antigen test, IgG neutralizing antibody to SARS-CoV-2 or a high-resolution CT scan of chest. antigen test, IgGsuggested: NoneSARS-CoV-2suggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources The patients were classified into Proven, Probable or Possible Mucormycosis as per the case definition suggested by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (MSG) [5]. EORTCsuggested: (EORTC, RRID:SCR_004070)SPSS 21 was used for all the calculations. SPSSsuggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-