Rapid spread of a SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant with a frameshift deletion in ORF7a
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Australia is currently experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks from infection with SARS-CoV-2 Delta variants (B.1.617.2, AY.3). Analysis of the index case reveals a sub-consensus level of sequencing reads (∼25%) that support a 17-nucleotide deletion in ORF7a (ORF7a Δ17del ). ORF7a Δ17del induces a frameshift mutation in ORF7a, which truncates the peptide and potentially leads to reduced suppression of host restriction factor BST-2/CD317/Tetherin. Despite this, the mutation has rapidly become represented at the consensus level in subsequent cases: approximately 72% of SARS-CoV-2 genomes in the Australian outbreak possess ORF7a Δ17del , and 99.7% (1534/1538) of Delta genomes on GISAID with ORF7a Δ17del originate from the current Australian outbreak (5 August 2021). The global abundance of this mutation might be underestimated given the difficulty of variant calling software correctly calling insertion/deletions (indels), the common inability of phylogenetics software to take indels into account, and the tendency of GISAID to not release submissions that contain a frameshift mutation (unless specifically requested). Overall, the rapid increase of persistent ORF7a Δ17del variants is concerning, and suggests either a chance founder effect with a neutral mutation yet to be purged, or that the ORF7a Δ17del mutation provides a direct selective advantage.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.18.21262089: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.18.21262089: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-