Peptide Scanning of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Subunit 1 Reveals Potential Additional Receptor Binding Sites

  1. Weilin Lin
  2. Jannatul Rafeya
  3. Vanessa Roschewitz
  4. David Smith
  5. Adrian Keller
  6. Yixin Zhang

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

The binding of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 to the ACE2 receptor on human cells is mediated by the spike protein subunit 1 (S1) on the virus surfaces, while the receptor binding domains (RBDs) of S1 are the major determinants for the interaction with ACE2 and dominant targets of neutralizing antibodies. However, at the virus-host interface, additional biomolecular interactions, although being relatively weak in affinity and low in specificity, could also contribute to viral attachment and play important roles in gain- or loss-of-function mutations. In this work, we performed a peptide scanning of the S1 domains of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 by synthesizing 972 16-mer native and mutated peptide fragments using a high throughput in situ array synthesis technology. By probing the array using fluorescently labelled ACE2, a number of previously unknown potential receptor binding sites of S1 have been revealed. 20 peptides were synthesized using solid phase peptide synthesis, in order to validate and quantify their binding to ACE2. Four ACE2-binding peptides were selected, to investigate whether they can be assembled through a biotinylated peptide/neutravidin system to achieve high affinity to ACE2. A number of constructs exhibited high affinity to ACE2 with K d values of pM to low nM.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.16.456470: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2021.08.16.456470v1 on bioRxiv