High Parental Vaccine Motivation at a Neighborhood-Based Vaccine and Testing Site Serving a Predominantly Latinx Community

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.30.21261274: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Human Subjects: The study was conducted under a public health surveillance program reviewed by UCSF Committee on Human Research.
    Consent: Survey participants provided consent in their preferred language.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Our study was subject to limitations. First, the survey was intentionally conducted among parents the vast majority of whom had themselves received a vaccine. Findings reported should thus not be extrapolated to the general population, but rather illustrate the potential to leverage community-based sites to effectively reach children in highly impacted areas for vaccination. Second, both scientific context and community attitudes can evolve rapidly. Rather than providing a single answer expected to remain static over time and place, the current study illustrates the potential to leverage community vaccination sites to rapidly generate actionable and locally and culturally relevant context-specific knowledge. Finally, we did not include surveys of the youth themselves, who have an important perspective that may influence vaccine uptake.19 In conclusion, Latinx parents disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and utilizing a neighborhood testing/vaccination site were highly motivated to vaccinate their children to protect their health and that of the community.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.