Unrestricted Online Sharing of High-frequency, High-resolution Data on SARS-CoV-2 in Wastewater to Inform the COVID-19 Public Health Response in Greater Tempe, Arizona
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a global integration of wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) into public health surveillance. Among early pre-COVID practitioners was Greater Tempe (population ~200,000), Arizona, where high-frequency, high-resolution monitoring of opioids began in 2018, leading to unrestricted online data release. Leveraging an existing, neighborhood-level monitoring network, wastewater from eleven contiguous catchment areas was analyzed by RT-qPCR for the SARS-CoV-2 E gene from April 2020 to March 2021 ( n =1,556). Wastewater data identified an infection hotspot in a predominantly Hispanic and Native American community, triggering targeted interventions. During the first SARS-CoV-2 wave (June 2020), spikes in virus levels preceded an increase in clinical cases by 8.5±2.1 days, providing an early-warning capability that later transitioned into a lagging indicator (−2.0±1.4 days) during the December/January 2020-21 wave of clinical cases. Globally representing the first demonstration of immediate, unrestricted WBE data sharing and featuring long-term, innovative, high-frequency, high-resolution sub-catchment monitoring, this successful case study encourages further applications of WBE to inform public health interventions.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.29.21261338: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter:…
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.29.21261338: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
