Conversion rate to the secondary conformation state in the binding mode of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 may predict infectivity efficacy of the underlying virus mutant

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Since its outbreak in 2019 SARS-CoV-2 has spread with high transmission efficiency across the world, putting health care as well as economic systems under pressure [1, 2]. During the course of the pandemic, the originally identified SARS-CoV-2 variant has been widely replaced by various mutant versions, which showed enhanced fitness due to increased infection and transmission rates [3, 4]. In order to find an explanation, why SARS-CoV-2 and its emerging mutated versions showed enhanced transfection efficiency as compared to SARS-CoV 2002, an improved binding affinity of the spike protein to human ACE has been proposed by crystal structure analysis and was identified in cell culture models [5-7]. Kinetic analysis of the interaction of various spike protein constructs with the human ACE2 was considered to be best described by a Langmuir based 1:1 stoichiometric interaction. However, we demonstrate in this report that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interaction with ACE2 is best described by a two-step interaction, which is defined by an initial binding event followed by a slower secondary rate transition that enhances the stability of the complex by a factor of ∼190 with an overall KD of 0.20 nM. In addition, we show that the secondary rate transition is not only present in SARS-CoV-2 wt but is also found in B.1.1.7 where its transition rate is five-fold increased.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.14.452313: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Expression was performed in HEK293 cells.
    HEK293
    suggested: CLS Cat# 300192/p777_HEK293, RRID:CVCL_0045)
    Spike protein constructs: The SARS-CoV spike protein constructs were expressed in HEK293-6E cells and purified via a C-terminally introduced 6 X His-Tag with Ni-NTA affinity chromatography.
    HEK293-6E
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_HF20)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Protein expression and purification: hACE2: The biotinylated hACE2-fc (residues 18-740) was purchased by Acrobiosystems and contains a C-terminal IgG1 Fc-Tag (residues 100-330), followed by a biotinylated Avitag.
    Acrobiosystems
    suggested: (ACRObiosystems, RRID:SCR_012550)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.