Antibody and T cell memory immune response after two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in older adults with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
We quantified S1-specific IgG, neutralizing antibody titers, specific IFNγ secreting T cells and functionality of specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in 130 young adults (median age 44.0 years) and 106 older residents living in a long-term care facility (86.5 years) after 2 doses of BNT162b2. Three months after the first injection, humoral and cellular memory responses were dramatically impaired in the 54 COVID-19-naive older compared to the 121 COVID-19-naive younger adults. Notably, older participants’ neutralizing antibodies, detected in 76.5% (versus 100% in young adults, P < 0.0001), were ten times lower than the younger’s antibody titers ( P < 0.0001). Antibody and T cell responses were greater among the 52 COVID-19-recovered than among the 54 COVID-19-naive older adults ( P < 0.0001). Our study shows that 2 doses of BNT162b2 does not guarantee long-term protection against SARS-CoV-2 in the older. An additional dose should be considered to boost their specific memory response.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.08.451426: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:
Identifier Status Title NCT04760704 Recruiting Covid-19 Vaccine Response in Elderly Subjects Results…
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.08.451426: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:
Identifier Status Title NCT04760704 Recruiting Covid-19 Vaccine Response in Elderly Subjects Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 29. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
