Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in the management of coronavirus disease 2019: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

  1. Ibtihal Abdallah
  2. Mohamed Aabdien
  3. Mohammed Danjuma

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction

Cyclosporine may improve the clinical course and outcomes of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to its antiviral and anti-cytokine effects as shown in vitro. A few ongoing trials are exploring the benefit of adding it to the standard of care (SOC) of COVID-19 patients.

Objectives

The primary objective is to evaluate the severity of COVID-19, determined by oxygen saturation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or the World Health Organization COVID-19 clinical severity scale in patients treated with oral or intravenous cyclosporine added to SOC compared SOC alone or placebo. Secondary objectives include mortality, length of hospitalization, length of ICU stay, and laboratory measurements as well as the safety outcomes of cyclosporine.

Methodology

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared cyclosporine to placebo or SOC in COVID-19 patients will be conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov will be explored for studies that satisfy pre-specified inclusion criteria. Quality assessment of all included studies will be performed. Meta-analyses will be done utilizing random effect models to estimate the effect of cyclosporine on the severity of COVID-19. Heterogeneity will be assessed utilizing Q statistics. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed.

Results

The result of this synthesis will inform potential changes in the management of COVID-19 patients, especially regarding the role of calcineurin inhibitors. Additionally, it will serve as hypothesis generating for potential future prospective studies.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.03.21259959: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Exclusion criteria: Information sources and literature search: We will search through PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov for published, unpublished, and ongoing studies.
    PubMed
    suggested: (PubMed, RRID:SCR_004846)
    EMBASE
    suggested: (EMBASE, RRID:SCR_001650)
    Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
    suggested: (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, RRID:SCR_006576)
    Google Scholar
    suggested: (Google Scholar, RRID:SCR_008878)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2021.07.03.21259959 on medRxiv